OCR Text |
Show ALIAS SUMMONS IN THE DISTRICT COUKT OF the First Judicial District of the territory ot Utah, Utah couu.y. The Anglo American Loan.Mortgage &.Agency Co,, Limited, ot London, a corporation, plaintiff, plain-tiff, vs. Thomas F. Earl ana Harriett E. iiarl, his wife, The Lombard Investment company, a corporation, and Milton B. Whitney, Charles S. Fairchild, Harry E Moonev, Sanford li. Ladd and Frank Hagermau, receivers of The Lombard Investment company, defendants. The People of the territory of Utah send greeting to Thomas F. Earl aud Harriett E. Earl, his wife, Tue Lombard Investment company, com-pany, a corporation, and Milton B, Wh:tuey, Charles S. Fairchild, Harry E. jlooney, Sanford San-ford B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers of The Lombard luyestment company, defendants. de-fendants. You are hereby required to appear in an action ac-tion brougut against you by the aboye named plaintiff, in the district court ot the First Judicial Ju-dicial district of the territory of Utah, and to answer tne complaint filed tuerein, within ten days (exclusive ot the day of service; alter the service ou you of this summons if served within this county; or if served out of this c unty, but in this district, within twenty days; otherwise witnin torty days or judgment bv default will be taken against you, according to prayer of this complaint. The said action is brought to obtain a decree of this court against the defendants herein for the sum of i.Tu2.70, with interest at 13 per cent, per annum, from the 1st day of January, A. D, 1895, until paid, and for iloO.uO attorney fees, and for costs of suit, plaintiff alleges that on the ith dav of March, lHsto, Thomas F. aud Harriett E, Earl, his wile, executed and delivered to The Lombard investment company com-pany a certain bond in the sum of il.6u0.U0, with 6 per cent, interest per annum, with" 12 percent, alter maturity That two of said coupons have not been paid and that the same witn the principal has been declared due and t ayable. That on March 21st, ibUO. the said Lombard Co. sold and assigned the said note to plaintiff, who is now tho ieira holder thereof, there-of, and did then and there guarantee the payment pay-ment of the within note and principal within two years from said last mentioned date. That the usual decree may be made for the sale of the said premises to pay said debt, interest, costs and attorney lees, that the proceeds of saie may be applied inpayment of the amount due plaintiff, and that said dei.'ndants and each of them and ail persons claiming under them or either of them subsequent to the execution exe-cution of said mortgage upon Baid premises, either as purchasers, encumbrancers or otherwise, other-wise, may be barred and foreclosed of all right, claim, -or equity of redemption in said premises and every par- thereof, and that the eaid plaintiff may have judgment and execution execu-tion against the said defendants Thomas F. Earl and Harriett E. Earl and The L jinbard Investment company, lor any deficiency which may remain alter applying the proceeds pro-ceeds of sale. For f uLer particulars see copy of . complaint on file. . . . Aud you are hereby notified that if you fail to appear aud answer the said complaint as above required, the sflid plaintiff will apply to the court for the relief therein demanded, and costs of suit. Witness the Hon. William H King, judge, and the seal of the District court of the First Judicial district in and for Seal the territory of Utah; this 15th day of February, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-five, J. w, Beasley, Clerk. By Geo. Havercaip, Deputy Clerk. Jameg A, Williams, attorney for plaintiff. |