| OCR Text |
Show TZI2R BKlaff.K COW. 'I'lhe Supreme Court BSesrs JUc Testimony la tiic laadwa k-Whipple k-Whipple Case. On Thursday morning the Territorial Territor-ial Supreme Court met and called up tho case of The People, respondents, vs. James Chadwiek and Edward Whipple, appellants. This is a case tried iu Provo, where the appellants were convicted of stealing steal-ing one cow, the property of a man named Anderson, who lives iu the First District, .-aid cow was described as a brindle cow about five years of age. The complaint filed in the lower court auegeu LiuiL me onuuie .:orv jtit ner happy home one morning in fine condition con-dition and starte.i to graze on the succulent buffalo grass iu that vicinity. vicin-ity. That while she was filling her four gastronomic apparatuses Chad-wick Chad-wick and Whipple appeared. What transpired can only be told on the morning of the insurrection when the brindle cow and the two defendants defend-ants get up before the judgment seat. But it is claimed an t the jury held that it was a fact, that the two men drove the brindlo covv to their barn, wlipvf wit ii malice : afnrel hftv.rht. ihv killed her and converted her fa t carcass into boarding-house hash. Her hido they cut up and hid, and Hr. Anderson, the "plaintiff, claims he found that part bearing tha brand in the hay in Chad-wick's Chad-wick's barn. The defendants were convicted. con-victed. From the verdict of the jury and the instructions of the court they appeal. The case was argued and sulj-mitted. sulj-mitted. - . |
