Show FIRST DISTRICT COURT The Captain Dayi Case Postponed for One Week Criminal Calendar Set Other Business Business transacted before Judge King after close of yesterdays report was as follows People vs IloEewall Dismissed People vs Demster Dismissed People vs Greenhalgb Set for Sep tember 28th THIS IOn ING The attorneys for the eense in the I Captain Davis homicide case asked for a continuance on account of absence of material witnesses The caee was continued until Monday September 24th and the jurorj excused until Wednes ay at 10 a m The judge informed the attorney that on Monday October 1st all civil cases pending will be set for hearng The setting of the criminal calendar was then taken up with the following result U S VB A Hague October 8th People vs John Greg October 9th People Vd McMurph et al Ootobe 6th 6thPeople People vs Underwood October 10th People vs EaBtwooiVOcouer 10th People vs Hill October 10th People vs Hugh and Emil Cartiney October 11th People vs Casper October 12th People vs Manhart and Penny October Oc-tober 12th People vs Tinde October 12th U S vs Porter and People e Anna Marks continued to November term One new citizen was made and court took a recess until2 oclock p m The following new cages were filed today John Knighton vs Christian Teter son Suit to recover on promissory note of 56026 dated at Salina February Febru-ary 6 1893 Joseph Chambers vs Aaron Gray et al Suit to recover on a promissory note of 8493 00 dated at Provo May Oth 1894 Eureka City vs R G Wilson ap pealed > case On September 1st 1894 t Mr Wilson was found guilty of ana fined 5000 for erecting a wooden building within the lire limits of Rureka city h c r Mizabeth Laird of Goeben vs R G WRy company appeale i case On July 2lst 1894 in Commissioner Dudleys coart Mrs Laird obtained judgment for 12500 and costs as remuneration re-muneration for a mare ki led October 29th1893 An order was hsued Out of court commanding George A Dusenberry to appear on Monday September 24th at 10 oclock to show cause why he shall not be adjudged to be in contempt of court for bis failure comply with the terms of a decree of divorce granted on April 18th lust Ida M Dusenberry divorced wife makes affidavit that she ia i in destitute circumstances and that he has failed to pay any alimony 17500 now being due |