Show can aila NOT 2 in the court of appeals in the maybrick case 1 today sir chai lea in hia argument an appeal it baited of a moat important question tuu for whom he appeared w re executors of tha late air who had effected aa insurance of with defendants defend anta the insurance company in favor of hia wife mra florence M who in now in a working jail said bad paid on account 1000 nf the amount but they refused tu pay iha r bainder in support of thib neual lin bai I 1 the that ll 11 conviction of aire IP bot co elusive bir charlei Chir lei 0 i the contrary the i aubia t cd ie tact that comma com mu d is i L evidence the ra i i he l ft hether mr brick 1 tle pi bicy m favor of wits and whether died at he chii t iho executors of the cl lima toe ex attorney genardi ihen proceeded ered to cite authorities in favor of his contention hiie present grew int of ju given july labit in an ac t jn broucht iti the interest of mr may brick against atee insurance association to recover on her hua banda life the court then fiat as mra bad been con of baini maider d her husband atie could not the lr which his life WA injured ae bi death ak ind lv l v ahe person for bloed t au t on was brought the day aate ibis WAS bendere i high leeal au made the ak senion the in a tiona refusal to pay arg ade of tier hu bands tit 3 leath caused uy her enat th woman to brine out lu chiv 1 ai lion the tri Teri in the fridl since ehe could compel the in burance company to broye that eh her husband this hah legal ia said to haye based hr P in ii on the fact that according to E lav the id not p it oilier but only the |