OCR Text |
Show k Is All a Stage of Evolution THE NEXT NINE YEARS An Analysis and a Prophecy by Wing Anderson First Printing, July 1938 PROPHETS AND PROPHECIES Foremost scientists of today accept time as a fourth dimension dimen-sion and realize that past, present and future are one in reality but separate in the conscionusness of individuals living in q three dimensional world. The future is a present fact and it is for this reason that the future can be foretold by those who have the ability to cognize that part of time which ever remains invisible to those less gifted, even though their perception per-ception be intermittent and fleeting. Authenticated prophecies are numerous. Perhaps the best known prophet, whose prognostications have been verified, is old Michel Nostradamus who lived in the sixteenth century. Between the years 1553 and 1556 this man wrote nearly a thousand four-line verses dealing with the immediate future qnd extending many centuries ahead. There is no doubt whatever what-ever that this man once lived for we'know far more about him than is known about Shakespeare. The1 facts bf hisjife and prophecies are not only attested by reliableiistorians but there are in existence many copies of his PROPHETIC CENTURIES. There is today, in the British Museum, a copy of a book containing con-taining his prophecies, which was printed in the year 1606. Verse .834 hot only gives an account of the activities of two men born in 1758, two hundred years after the verge wds written,, but also names the men. Several of the verses name men born many years after Michel Nostradamus' death. He speaks of the French palace, The Tuileries, built many years after his death, mentions Nopollart, and several other rulers of France who took office centuries after his verses were written. Like most prophecies, those of Nostradamus were written in a style to conceal their meaning; until after the events foretold fore-told had transpired.. His verses are full of anagrams, puns, plays on words, and cryptic forms; hard to interpret until events mentioned have taken place, then their meaning becomes be-comes perfectly clear. Perhaps the best analogy of past, present and future is the motion picture. The complete story is on the film at all times. The past is comparable to that part of the story which has been screened, the present to that. which is before the eyes of the audience and the future is that part of the story still on the reels waiting to' pass hrough the projection machine. mach-ine. As it takes, a combination of film, light, lens and screen to make the picture visible to us, so must there be some com-" com-" bination of unknown elements that make the future cognizable, cogniz-able, at times, to those we call prophets. It is very improbable that anyone ever lived who could see the future as a clear, continuous, unfolding picture but many have been given intermittent in-termittent glimpses of future events. |