Show im ait 0 m m afe inar p and t e alia interesting proceed gnp K cairrel at a of HIP supreme belil is taken ruin alio amr t news alio purpose of alio was elih t the i abe court rel ninfi to the ct llan iier dyer and neg ly iho ot cerlian by ane A uie anil 11 V tho in the cen frel in atin ot re laite to ali m flier bolf r 1 alie ii rt biad been uon t I 1 liars replied eliat lie biad drawn ali irla of alij court following alie of jude i lie orar of alie court art ivawn fiut to lilli emlu opinion lie anat lie dl elbow hint itie 0 alin for vms excessive und llie order was and eliat the cougil uon tho ahat anweil juice ine I 1 want to know if we will axi permitted to offer evidence ti prove that claim for ta excessive sibilant and ancon M ion able lu blidt cage adani to amend the order by inserting after the words contained in said petition if said m tees heretofore tiled in this court the following also testimony as to whether t ian excessive ces sive exorbitant and charge tor what receiver giai done and id proof of iesue any evidence may be of what lie alono or what lie lias not done that lo 10 should have done As to the time allowed I 1 wish to say that we cannot pet in our evidence lu four days one of our wit nescia is in arizona and another is in idalio judge bovyer in li anding this order up I 1 to ay eliat my brother zin Z in e wines back to alia over the amount of compensation to be allowed tha receiver rece iier alie order as handed vi by judge powers la ad follows at thi of baid court held at the city ot salt late on monday ilia day of cannary fan nary present the elliot andvord and ford chief justice and glenry 1 headerson Heu derson and jacob B associate justices in the above entitled action a motion to amend he journal entry of llila cuart having been made and argued by the attorneys for alio receiver in said cause aa well as a motion by attorneys of ertain school trust cea in alie matter pending before court and heretofore re acred to to ate testimony concerning certain charges against frank II 11 dyer and ceorge S peters and parley LV tl liams ahli attorneys tho ers last aforesaid afore oaid moving this court to punish the said dyer receiver as aforesaid as for contempt for bia refusal to answer certain questions put in the couse of the examination before said examiner and both of said matters hiving been tally argued by counsel and the court having luketi the rame under advisement and being fully advised thereon it is ordered that alie motion lo 10 amend the journal entry bo and tho game id alonce alon cd and that the said tho examiner here appointed proceed anil as may ba produced by elthier parly aothia prote edin rc any and all ut fraud corruption misconduct or fraudulent claims and charges tor and conduct the wt of frank II 11 der as receiver in this case and george S peters and parley L williams as his attorneys contained in said petition of said trustees heretofore filed in this court that I 1 ho said and lie is hereby clothed ith all ahn howera and authority as an examiner of this court for atio purposes of such examination that he be and he liere by is authorized and to hear and determine all qui fictions eliat may arisa the of with ret crenco to paid charges to lie babu extent as if alie matter was axing tried subject however to the right of either party to appeal to tasa court by way of execution to his lings thereon that the parties hereto he to take from foiw to appear before said examiner that said ie and lie is hereby authorized and empowered officer eitnier federal or territorial to attend him under his and to fit their compensation to cm ploy stenographers and witnesses and it ii further ordered that baid examination on the part of tho petition ers begin on thur addy alie ettli day of january A U at 10 a in support of said charge and that said petitioners petition ers have four daia in which to produce their testimony in sup port tit said charges as herein set forth that baid atilt with testimony to baid e larks on the etli day of january A I 1 at 10 a m said have four dava in which to produce coir testimony in reply to hie said charges that daiil examiner devoe ay iy and tuesday ard 3rd the ulcina of rebuttal idony the time to be divided the pities as the said examiner direct eliat i be eala examiner nino report to athla court of its actions aej ilo inga abtil of the testimony so taken and all the proceedings had before him on the day of february A 1 and the hearing upon said report and tho amount of compensation to be allowed to the said rei fiver and to the paid attorneys be pet tor alie 1 alli day of february next at loo and it h further ordered that the said examiner may chang ithe allotment of time of tho a flair mofid testimony as set forth M lie may deem just provided nothing hall be doni interfere with alie grinj of the said report on february next ills further ordered eliat alie motion to the receiver tor contempt be denied and that he may go before tho examiner and ertha questions heretofore ruled by alie slid to be proper and which lie said receiver refused to answer A discussion of alie amendment ensued judge rowers aksiuk that to allow it would be to maka the examination a mere for the collection of Bf Andal it implied tint the cout needed assistance from the outside to conduct iti business and should not le allowed the court then until yesterday upon at tho lima in the adjournment judge zane stated eliat ho desired to bo liy the court for but a jid then road tho following document art the supreme CW of 11 th ter nory 1 united states of america vs church of jenus christ of latter day saints et al to the supreme court of attali territory the court tha school trustees mata tho order ot the court as now modi fled by the court baa totally ida taice rf h A paia in lighten in loaf eca raff tac to ilis mn rp felver aej p han annl fur aliar lix alix former omer aff ife havi ilori uBo ali la anler cannot abo C IM lui now alil that we cannot alo alia only ll iiii that an e inducing In duing or jil ali to do ure i oni petely arriler artin ilia only luty in with I 1 lie mailer that alion in hal ly thia anler lie foint boutil finbow jsn netlie of partying on an into ahti rf fieten of alid unit wllie alic ir idairy airy naro limit alie lida ann all ollier of f nadire bri tlc alc boort liff u 11 r we beull ull diuri moat of til allas ilione of allm do not to ul 1 corrns lion or blonak ve are cut til from buy 11 amry into anny the 0 lii li din it y anil ibi chier i or we an afler proof order f of a lijar that r bol li fraud illint md lOri abic wo no of mch a tharna in conr petition and therefore we van oner no proof whatever on iott billj atul cunil had ue nil when alm wai made allm investigation boult be limited as it now i we would visa liae declined dei lined to rotc fl 1 it be the duty of lie court to carefully scrutinize llie t of lid on receiver ami if it would place alm duly upon us then it diwald not alio llio it now d to arts anil to those annc lot to m elac nd lie lo 10 liin butiro conduct ai re leeier eier in as llie daiy af tho court ftc ne would beree to priced under voula vou lj so ami eliat e voula not complete proceeding price eding ander llie original order me to offar evidence as to that the receiver had done or failed to do in order that we inett enable alio court to alx the compensation for in services but llila malter leing eluded by ilia amended order only a emall rf he receivers doines can le under wo H aliee iii be wrt if it i Tilie lie for in H valiera tho examination would not and R it ia under order in that way alio llio examination boull be mado and luora satisfactory to the court ablong as we lad a chance of benefiting the common of this territory MO thought it our duly apro leel couceiro couce ivo it to no part to proscenia pr oscenia of fraad nd corruption against officers 0 this coart bior dy we conceive it a patt of our duller either ai school cea or ai private citizens to incur the larka expense of front different differ eDt counties coun lies in and cen from idaho and alzna merely U ng par icolar acts of its rei faiver cathu above batad anil the complete he character of afe mAdea tUm lao di we inn tsu fline 0 o a danl jury or to ait fint to lie alie court in of its own h we submit n A IFF trustee ishin li brict J 1 1 U twelfth iii ral T 0 chairman Cb airman of alio bloard trustees seventh school hay it honors if coald lie surprised at any in this extraordinary proceed in I 1 would lie by the remarkable pa berthat ler that liaa just kieen rend jodan sandford Sand tord we do not care to hear any about it alie blerk will alie oft liese i hut it mill nut go on file lie will dimply receive it for further consideration it ia a remarkable document and we desire to consider it careri illy jude bowers kiy artion is taken on lie reatter in the document I 1 disiro simply lo 10 say a ew wards on juda judd interrupting the paper is of an extraordinary nature that ate prefer to further consider it without by counsil conn sil alie t wai under ad and the court took a recess |