Show MI all hie ati and agama Is sow in the following additional testimony in the trial of howard for killing tS ergeant pike thirty years ago was offered by the wednesday afternoon and yesterday mrs margaret spencer testified to having been defendant after he was hurt lie biad aldays been good and good tempered but after his reco very waa morose sullen and excitable did not believe lien as of bound mind at the time of lie killin dr IV F anderson testified to having attended spencer after the injuries from the blow of the musket in the annb of aike removed large pieces of bone two months after the skull as crushed the bone remold would be at least three inclima in length the efleta of such a aloiv upon the bead would be ery uncertain it might render one an insane man and it might not injure him mentally at all lie as really in a lery critical condition be was under my charge from alie auh of march until the latter part of june I 1 saw him after that several times his condition was not at all good I 1 thought that it was not ai bowl as it should be I 1 did not think ills nien till wal f saw croat evidences of a chance in hii mental condition he was not alie same man at all under any excitement after blib an injury to the bead one would be very apt to show symptoms of insanity the presumption would be that tinder the circumstances the adint of revenge w take possession of a man and incite him to do deeds that be would not do in a state of mental equilibrium I 1 think hie meeting of the mari who had produced the injury would have a very bad upon the defendant I 1 do not think ha would be able at all to control under each circumstances he hardly be able to tell right from bronit to mr lilies alie bone was forced into die brain for at leai t a quarter of an inch enough to fracture all alie membranes and cauce some of the brain matter to exude arr martha spencer testified I 1 have known howard spencer about forty years ho is ny stepson Bt epson before his injuries be was always kind and gentle after his injuries there was a decided difference in ilia conduct and manner lie was irritable and unmanageable doctors benedict hamilton arda and gave expert evidence as to what effect aiichi a blow as that received by defendant would have upon a roan they all agreed that nothing but insanity could bo expected after such injuries men biad become insane from less burls it vi be al moat impossible to leold a man responsible under eiichi circumstances though it did not necessarily follow that bubli injuries would cause ioa anity yet it was moro alian probable that ended the testimony on wednesday yesterday morning theuret witness called wai george 11 spencer brother of defendant he testified to bringing spencer from hush valley to bait lake in a low condition to the hutt lie biad re reined remembered alie day of the shooting was eating dinner ft lien it occurred defendant lived for years after the tragedy in suit lake and was not out of the territory in 1871 he went south to live he married since the elio otin and now lias a family orlando F tierron testified I 1 was in sill aake at alio time of atio shoot inn of BerKe aut aro I 1 saw the shooting I 1 came out to the street about ten minutes before the shooting five soldiers came down the street and aa aliey got to Goddar dB store a man one of on the shoulder wa was like who readied his liand as if boink for a the man who spoke to him row a pistol and fired at alike the man then within six rno and crossed the street pike called out my god im A foldier and someone else caught piko three followed lie man who shot and one said shall we shoot they all had revolvers an allicer said aso I 1 know spencer and I 1 do not think it vas him nover did think he fired the shot to mr Il ilesI wag standing in front 0 the alley that ent in by atie hotel aike waa square in front of iod darda etore when he was shot when tho maD tapped ale on the eli the latter reached liia lund to fiig left bide where lie carried his pistol and the man tired no one hollered to stop him there WAS soma ex man vent aiuto the alleyway north of Tea adeta store is now I 1 had not aen spencer that year the wan who did the shooting idail on a lomeo alouse and dark hat I 1 think there was nothing giai on a neither aoa thero peculia about itra I 1 could not tell alie I 1 cuilo it nas a navy revolver eliat nas atie coin moil weapon in days no one mid to trie alint day that it was spencer who did alie shooting hear his came in conets lion with it a lonn time afterward did not hear of the trouble in hash valley till after the shouting never bad any with spencer ft a ft ere associated together as boys I 1 do not think U afta spencer abo shot the man ho did the elio otin caino up behind pike from n little IB wua alone william brown corroborated alio of Her roii vincent testified that he was on tile brand jury in IS spoil cr nan not in hiding at tho time II 11 11 clawson brother in law of defendant Thonia fl jenkins mid mrs Katli erine S and afra ellen S claw son of defendant aed to liis ROOI and amiable befaro he received any in binea a great hanga atas made ia dim afterwards lie acted strangely was domineering irritable and quarrel nome lift was not sane for a few years afterward the defence newte 1 dra prosecution that hero it roan had received lucli injuries AS shohe span ers licad showed tie must have received and such as those by the nit neMea followed lucli actions tene rally thoo of a bane man injuries however were generally though not of in Manity lAon aril testified eliat sergeant ilke anade no eddit to draw a lie had no pistol took oil the belt atler alio shooting mr opened alio argument for alio pros coition the case hill doubtless go to the jury today to day |