Show wife yet no wife when the case of margaret garet kuspert ti against jolin john cli charlea arle s kuspert now nay pending in the superior cour court new now york ci city t y is reached and tried its decision one way or the tile other will make a decided sensation Zell sali ion in the tile city there ore tire thousands like it proceedings ce in the police ponce courts and after death in the su surrogates rr court I men llen seduce women and the tile wo pien under promise of m marriage a ari ag P go and cohabit to together ther they live as man and wife but t after a few years tho the man becomes too high toned fur for his partner and he lie sets her adrift phe she lias has no redress as she has been only a ti mistress A breach of promise of mar ro arriago riago is is supposed to begin when the parties are young but in this case it is one of twenty years stan standing dinc 11 the woman living with the tile man during that time bearing his name litt having ving children by liim him and helping him to make a fortune at the end of all these years she is set adrift with no provision made for her to make room fora for a younger mate in the complaint to antho in the superior court through mr W if IL mcdougall her attorney mrs kuspert gives a history to of tile case when she knew kuspert first she believed him to bean unmarried man capable of carrying out a valid cont contract bract of mard marriage jage that will not be denied on oil the trial it w was as on or about the month of september 1859 she f formed ormed the acquaintance of kuspert and find after their compain companionship lious bip ripened he to marry li her er as soon as promised ec e had saved money enough to support rt her the old story she believed fi alved and was ruined in the winter of 59 she told kuspert the condition of affairs how liow she was soon likely to become a mother he ile told her not to worry ho be would make a temporary home for her provide for her through her sickness only she slip sh should come conic and live with him As she was situated she had two choices a hospital and lose the man that promised to be lier her husband or go with him and take a temporary home with the prospect of being wife as hs well as mo mother tiler relying on the good faith of mr Ru kuspert spert slie she went to live with him and in june 1860 or shortly after a child waa born ai soon as she recovered mrs kuspert again requested the carrying out of his promise mise not so go much for herself but for the childs sake that it might have a legitimate name he again again promised that he lie would oblige lier her ent but it was not then convenient wait he lie said till lie could get a little more money there was no hurry E everybody very body knew sho she was mrs kuspert lier her character or his was not injured As she was mrs kuspert in the tile house out of it every everywhere w here slie she went except in tit alie church records she waited to give him time to make the money that he lie wanted to get got together and helped him in every way that woman could and woman can she alleges that after living with mr kuspert as his wife from CO 60 to 80 he be deserted her that during these many years that slie she lived with mr kuspert girder repeat ed pro promises of marriage s she b e bore him five children and that she devoted her services to him and his children for the best years of her life As slie she is now considerably advanced in ill life unable longer to maintain herself by her own exertions and is left almost entirely destitute and wit without i I iou t means of support she lias has instituted this suit in the seventh paragraph of the complaint she says that by b y reason odthe of the wrongful acts of the defendant as aforesaid in ill seducing the plaintiff under promise of marria marriage ge in in persuading and inducing the plaintiff to live with him and acx bear children under per perpetual emual promises and absolute ref refusal tisa F to carry out his promise or marry the plaintiff I in i II 11 the spring of 1881 and by his desertion of the plaintiff leaving her destitute as aforesaid she has r cd ed and sustained dama damages es to the amount of 11 tho the defendant is alleged to be worth why should not she as copartner ba b entitled to one half hall although only a wom woman an i the eighth grievance in the complaint faint alleges that mr kuspert since deserting his acknowledged wife has married another woman but that docs does not affect this action her ifer action is for breach of contract and services rendered if mrs kuspert proves tile facts set forth it ajl wi l be a hard bard h badea jury that give her a r rousing ausing verdict |