Show is I 1 jr I 1 ala i t either tho chicago nete is per trilling rau d or L tile bublic or an I 1 1 I 1 jil 1 to rou fv 6 e comin 0 1 ell 1 6 bended amazing decision of the centa to the neu the ohia con rt holds that jo publish of another that lie Is s tractor trat tor aliar an official 4 recalcitrant 1 I 1 I 1 and biln cai actionable these words being very and 69 entil lib abid riot at A 11 to the aze not 4 per se libelous i some of tile ac di functions malio by the court ire as follows it may W it deleda fant meant tbt pa was a liar in FA its worst sense that he Is a common ana iame willful I 1 8 ve r all 11 licious I 1 liar that he delibe bately in material 11 1 M designedly 1 etters in all the relations of life it I 1 his business social religion and political relations tho ch arg a a r site a libel but it ho meant I 1 was unreliable in a political serse or in a particular personal matter r aba t 0 advocates advocat ea false doctrine in theology or I 1 it would not I 1 ao 10 pa 1 I means a silly fellow a block bes it Is the opposite of a philos oliber arid is only one way of sayin the plaintiff is not a stated man I 1 I 1 rouse it Is very annoying and inconvenient I 1 not to W a states man but there As nothing in it that I 1 IL has tendency to disgrace and 1 do gr ado tir the judge who wrote the foregoing decision must have been at one time I 1 in big life an editor any oto 1 else 1 e 0 1 uld not halo stated ute c e so diffly toward law and so favorably toward jhb public interest t |