Show PROVES NOTHING AGAINST JENSEN t J J fy t Embezzlement Charge Is Dismissed Dismissed Dismissed Dis- Dis missed by Order Orde of r the Court MONEY WAS LEFT IN SAFE 4 Claim It Was ns Stolen and NoV Nu Xu NuI V I E Appears i to W Refute I Ills Sin Statement 11 Acting CUlb un under er In instructions given b by Judge G. G G. G Armstrong n ng the Jury jur In th the case CUiL C l of Of t Illard C. C Jensen charged with the embezzlement of from flom Alma ina Ken Kendall all returned led a verdict oCr of oC I f r not hot guilty built yesterday afternoon 1 without l leaving the jUl Jury box hox The state Mute completed its presentation r of of- side its of the cat ease e. e by noon at which r I time o the attorneys for Mr Ir r. r Ten r- r moved for COr the discharge o of oC their client clienton r on the grounds of insufficient In evidence to ti-i his the prove guilt On le resumption c of if the court In the afternoon Jud Judge e Armstrong ong so instructed the tho jury 1 The ca case c was as dismissed ed without the 3 defendant having to present any evi l dence deuce I ln was accused of oC embezzling t- t the money from Crum l Kendall November J tI t 10 Kendall claimed that he lie had collected a number of oC election bets giving ig the money to tu Jensen who was working for fol the 1 Coy lI er livery stables to iti place In the safe The he prosecution Introduced evidence e to lo show the mone money hall had been heen left In iii the custod custody Of bf J Jon Jen- en- en Men sen Kendall claimed that when he back the thc next morning for Cor the I money If j. wu was guile gone one and anti Jensen claimS claim claim- S rd it hud had been stolen Kendall thereupon had Jensen n sir sir- d on a tL chargo of ol embezzling the lie money Jl XH I JU t IS OUT TOOTH i Such I 1 Is Charge c of Applicant for fUl a a To i nh ln Because c. c as al she hc alleges alleSe he lie annulled her hel with force and violence violence- and battered bat bat- bred her to tho the extent of or breathing breaking out Jut outa f a tooth bOut and Inflicting other minor injuries injuries in in- juries Elise gUse yesterday filed flIed an I action netlon in the district cou court t for ell dl- from Crom her husband John J tJ Thc They were married In lii this his city April o 18 1595 Four children arc are the thc re- re J. J suit Hull of the marriage the eldest behig be- be hig 10 years eals old and tho the youngest 3 The COlli complaint plaint that lh de- de c- c I Is a butcher earning a about out c. t 75 per mouth month eforo the tiff asks for fora fOIa Ii a decree of oC separation 1 i for foe tho thu custody of th the lIw children and aad 11 i in hi the lie sum of 25 S j per month mouth nu 1 1 IE J SL SMALL SLI I ROAD D. 9 4 c 9 JN-I JN I- I filch li Our One Against a Wa- Wa li aunt and An n of or jud judgment from rein the United States tute circuit court COUlt of uC the lie t southern dl district of or New York Yoth was flied filed III in tile the ollice of oC the count county clerk I yesterday In III which a Judgment for COl the thc yI y- I sum of nC 5 is entered in Ca- Ca j vor 01 oi of Russell Hussell Sage Hag Raphael a nephew of C the thC noted financier an and amid against the thet t- t fk Wasatch and Jordan Jot Va Valley II C Railroad h c Its Us om officers and directors f Judgment was rendered March 28 1 i 1 lOG The Time action was vas brought to ref ref ref re- re f- f f f Cover o thi Ow amount asked for fot under a 1 deed on the ho property of the com com- L rany lanY to S secure an au I Issue nc of bonds 1 d Want Want- Balance on 1111 Mining J IK HI The Thc stint hum of oC 2085 ix iM Involved In iii the lie t- t cn c now 1111 on un trial before Judge C C. C W. W Muru ise In which John flack is the tle d plaintiff and aUll William and cud IU mere are defendants The flie action grows rowlS grows out of oC a mining deal December 23 I 1800 S f the plaintiff lUrr alleges c he transferred trans trams to the the- defendants t twelve wel mining l claims In lii the West est Mountain l mining V district for 01 the sum um of f and 2 shares of Jf a company to bo be organized 4 with with- till the claims as us the IhO the basK ha i The plaintiff alleges that thal only onh 15 has hus been Val paid in account He th therefore I judgment r tI the balance J i 2 Wife Alleging that huts his wife wilfully desert desert- i ed Ci him tutu art after l' l only fourteen cJ w wedded wed red hIx R. R dl dl- ded hd Bonn MUCH sues for or Ol tic i frou rom A lla M Mr 11 i Bun Bonn nl- nl l- l k leges that thal ho wax was n married nie ti to tu the tue dt def def- In this city February 2 1005 and amid that on on- February 16 1905 1305 de- de e- e sorted him hill Thc They were marl married ed h by County County- funt Cleric David Darld A. A Smith lri in III tho ho of or the lao county clerk clork and tho brides bride's- name was Alta AHa eft ell She x camo amo ouia fi-ouia Wichita Kansas I i j fr Court In lii the ca case of ot F. F o and others y v vs J. J F. F Free and others other In In- which the plaintiff sought to renew a Judgment Judgment Judg Judg- 4 ment fur for the motion of or attorney ator- ator 1 t. t ney nc for fOl defendant for Ol a non non- suit norm V wits was I t taken under advisement by Ju Judge ge I Ritchie yesterday c I fr frk k 1 Joseph II 11 Moss Jo filed Jc a petition Inthe in inthe y- y the lao probate division of oC il the district court yesterday a askIng that he he lac be bc appointed administrator of the estate stale I I of lC Jr B. B Moss s. who died ill iii this i f i 7 ell city 13 1902 leaving an all I J estate va valued at 1000 I Ju Judge gu C C. W. W Morse granted a mo- mo for a suit non yesterday o In hi the case of or James Storey against t A. A W. W Miller l' l and rH Th lI stilt null wa fi ta t to In N lIlu the 1111 ft i I brought originally cum of hr w damage t all all' t 1 tu haI have ha I been n by IW th defendant t b bv ll of oC lh time the waters aers from front the in-i- in I gating ditches 8 of or th the tup flood Clou flooding lug ing hl his lands lainis mi tom which ho hie wits its I i a tallow tahlia facto factory and he ho tai al- I ic ICi ed pi I I Cd Ii him I i n from flom pursuing isu lug his business Judgment f fill fr M- M was on- on II- II let let-ed yesterday h by Judge Judge- T. T D. D Lewis I IIII III In tho hit cis of II P. P P. P King ICing and others 3 against st l I a ZIa Thompson and others The plaintiffs hall had sued for fOl U 1500 1 OO damages alleged to have hl hen been sustained sus Stis- In Iii their lack premises at rS 58 East Kast Second South street b by a wall salI weakened weak ened nel by hr hea heavy rains falling on their place of ur 11 1 13 Tin The pia plaintiffs are an barbers and amid they claimed that the lie falling tailing walls II had destroyed th their heir h fur fUI furniture Ui and amid fixtures The charge chargo of forgery against Roland Ro Rn- lan land 11 II Chiau was III dismissed 11 by Judge G. G G. G Ann Armstrong In iii the tho inal hid division 11 of the district court yes s-es- yesterday on motion of District Attorney ney ne F F. C. C It Chase was vas MI MIch ch charged with forging th the lie name JB J B. B Colclo Ceicle to a check cheek which lie hl lund had rl passed on a merchant The ell district attorney stated slated that the tho complaint stated that the tho chock check was wn MI signed CB C B. B lie He al also o stated slated hi iii I his motion rOle for dismissal of or the he complaint that there was no such mch person as as- JB J B. B Ceicle consequently nobody's name had been forged force |