Show COURT lIEnS Frank I HoRnum's Petition for fm Writ nit fr of Mandate Is Ii- II Denied Frank Hofmans Hofman's Hoffmans Hoffman's p petition tot for a writ of oC mandate against Judge T T. D. D Lewis to compel him him to reinstate an appeal taken taleen front from the time Justices Justice's court to the tue district court was wa denied denle In Inan Inan inan an opinion handed down yester yesterday morning in the tile mu court Justice Justice Jus Jus- tice lice Joseph E. E wrote the opinIon opinion ion iou and It I was concurred 1 In by Chief Justice McCarty antI and Ju Justice Time The acl action n wu wi s brought before berolo th the Supreme court b by certiorari proceed proceed- ings Accor According to the time arguments In Inthe the he case judgment was waa rendered against Hoffman in the time ju justices justice's attempted to tu appeal It court and amid ant he lie I to lu the time district COUI court Time The sureties suretes for undertaking an appeal were objected to and the they failed to qualify as us ic- ic by law l-iv Th The on oil 01 appeal ap up- peal iaal was filed t in Iii the thc district court CO and amid asked tho time I tho tw plaintiff In the time case court to dismiss l the time CL case e on tIme the grounds that no undertaking had been filed a as as required t by luw Judge Julge Lewis LeLis granted tho time motion moton of th the plaintiff ani and lie tho lw case elS was wa ills dis ls- ls missed Hoffman Hofman then thou filed a writ TJ of or certiorari In lathe tho Supreme n II J or order r den der to ha haV harthe thc c ow id ld The Supreme court held hold that Judge Lewis mild dirt not to 10 I try iry tr the case on Us its iA it b because ause us the the appeal hind not hi beon iti n petr perfected I mil alil that ho did tlc have a right to lo mt tho the cn cae on In the grounds that no noI mm I undertaking n I ng Was wag f filed 1 as required 1 by hy bylan I li law lan v. Time The lu Supreme court WAS in session and heard the In Int Ints arguments t t s lw's WI i ea cat H. The following soa co-soa COS' COS were wre submitted AIr MI Mrs c. c Anna Hilton Hion against Thatcher and the time estate of or Thomas Mule Mie against 1 Elizabeth LivI Liv- Liv LI I ilg i cue olf administratrix I 1 |