Show HATIC HATE WE A boursot Boua sot A XONG u us s 1 T the he la last t I 1 number U biber of Putman 8 s montill monthly y magazine lias has an 1 ai hicl written by the rev jin john H hanson endorsed by ay the P ey dr francis L hawk wh which ich acu binef ies i twenty four pages 11 to prove thai chatte the rev eleazer williams now ro w a missionary among amona the indians from the protestant episcopal church carch is none other oilier than the Daup dauphin llin and a soh son of louis louie i 1 of france A mas of strong I 1 1 evidence eviden cu is is furnished evidence so connected and pimply consistent that it seems conclusive to show chow the fate of louis the th seventeenth and that the dauphin was secretly conveyed fr from OM prison to this country and placed amon among 9 the indians in deans in in the northern part of new I 1 A french gentleman dia at new orleans in 1848 8 named Boti boulanger langer who ho confessed on his deathbed death bed that he fie Is as the paison person who brought the dauphin to this c cou 0 U ulry r Y when the prince d de e I 1 joinville Join villo ca came ie to t this country in in 41 lie he sought out mr williams and afler demanding a conditional pledge of tc tiresy resy from him told him he was louis and asked I 1 hial to si sign agn a resignation of his hil title 4 to lo the crown off j anci in in favor of louis phil arz appe p this thib lit mcwilliams mr williams asserts to be true a and nd also whatnot eliat not on mid lydid the prince de jom join ville afterwards afler wards correspond with wilh him through his secretaries but bui that lou louia is philipp wrote to him film MT mr Willi williams ains with his own hand after afler the princes return louis phillippe knew the dauphin was alive and the name of the dauphin was omitted from the sole nim ties tor the departed bourbons during louis Phill Phi lUppes ippei reign another piece of strong evide evidence nep apoe statement that the french amba ambassador issidor bent while in this country in in 1848 acknowledged in in the presence of dr francis Frat icis and other gentlemen of this city that the dauphin was not dead but was brought to america As the prince de and other parties referred rel erred tp to in the article are still alive there can he be no suspicion of an attempt at deception unless it can be on the part of dr williams and dr hawks says ia y s all the precedents of his character chir acter are aie antagonistic to this idea mr williams has oi not t been the active agent in bringing the facts before the public the story true or false is full of interest graphically written watten and highly romantic in its in details the object af pf this strange article is to cumish evidence that I 1 louis son of louis XVI kingoff king of france an anil of marie Ati toinnette of austria did not die in prison in 1795 as was reported to the french convention convent tion but is still alive ard and in the state of new york in th eperson of mr williams the writer is evidently evide sincere and his expose must not be confounded with ith the vulgar hoaxes which bieh have sometimes some timea mystified the public indeed the testimony of cherev the tRev dr hawks excludes the suspicion of deception oil boston eve ning transcript |