Show l 4 l tf ASK m FOR Want the Court to Grant Them Decrees of Separation From Their Husbands aIlUs I DESERTION TIlE THE MAUl MAlt CAUSE CAUSES I I Those Concerned Arc Ace Lizzie Sammons Marie G 5 II i is tow to ami arni Lillie Hose Ho c Three who hu were deserted de by their husband tiled filed suits for or divorce In the district court pila for Jor fora a II divorce from rom Wit Wil Willam Witham lam ham H 11 on eli tho the grounds of It c and nid failure to support Thy The 4 were vore In iii au Francisco l Cut Cat Culon Cuton on June Jutie 0 O ISO isa isai i Malle Cl Ci I ullo iIo cek a divorce from from M on the sum am grounds round They Tho were married In Pro Provo Provo vo on Aug 12 ISM IS 9 and have one oie child of at which plaintiff asks the tho custody Lithe Mabel Hose Huse In Is tho the third ono one p Who vho aks t tl to Ira IJo relieved from train the bonds bond t of at matrimony SilO Bho alleges that her herp p husband LeHoy N Hose has lias deserted her and und has hall failed ailed to provide for tor her 1 They fhe were married on March 20 26 1899 and have two children of oC which plain plaintiff J tiff tift asks tho custody custod JUDGMENT i REVERSED r Supreme Court fill Kny cy nn no Cause i Of if Action In Cane Tho rh supreme court yesterday afternoon handed down nij a ol opinion opinIon I I ion the tho judgment of ot the tho lower court In the tho case ense of ot Oliver Oller S R Sartin against the tho Oregon Line Lino Railroad company appel hints The Th notion was WAil brought to re ra recover recover cover coer damages for tor personal Injuries inJure by b plaintiff on Sept Hept 2 1902 near Idt while hiIe In the employ of ot defendant company Plaintiff Willi riding on A 1 aE E with witti other white while the there rest rent re 1 of ot the Kane gang riding on an another another another other handcar in III the tho rear Tho The men mell were racing the cars cam to 10 see Bee which could make JUnko the mile In the tho quickest time Lime when plaintiff toll foil from the thO th car cur was run ru over ocr by the other car being f severely Injured The jury In the lower court rendered a It verdict in favor of ot Plaintiff for tor or This FhI Judgment Is reversed by lIy the supreme court which holds that there ther wu no cause enuse of ot action The Tha opinion was written by I Justice concurred In by lIy Chief Jus JUg tire tle and Justice McCarty |