Show TWO TO SUPREME SUP M COURT COU T OPINIONS OPI IO SI Judgement Affirmed in Iii the Case Of Jungk ct et nl at vs 5 And Aud DISPUTE OVER OVE MINING CLAIM Court C Says Assessor Ill Did Jl Not Use Ordinary nary nar Diligence New Trial In Case Casc Tim Thin court Saturday handed down 1 0 1 two t W opinions Ions onto one Ing luR and nun tine the oilier reversing tire the Judg jud Judgment ment of ot the tire lower louver court In Ime II time the caso circe of ot Franz Franiz 1 ut at lt nl nil II vs VB a Grunt runt Snyder mind and 1 I 1 r 1 I appellants 8 thu time Judgment of ot tho lower court COUlt Is la The lire action Icon etna brought In ire coun county count ty t t I riot not let title to the time Henrietta claim call located In un the tic 0 II r mining ne I Ic I rig ii 1 darned clamed t title tle to the Ilia lode odo by I United Status Hiatus patent ail an al r 1 Defendant dammed tItle by ii h vi of at n it tux tax deed executed hy Iry tho tIme county C H fi of t conn coun In Inc 1120 Ac According According According cording to the tire nets facts in the tho case tho tino elaine claim was suns Wil assessed 1 on tho time records of ot county t unknown n owners The fIre tax not being wIng paid haul on OIL tire the sauce same Baie It Ita vas evas a sold cold sul l by b the tiro lh county to The Tho h testimony went to show that tin tho assessor apparently ron tb used tuned lel no o effort to tn loam learn the tire mimes of thu tire owners of ot tho thu claim v which he lee could have havu hl Ie dune dono by tha timo thou use uso u o of ot ordinary diligence Thu ilo lower louver lowe court COUlt tendered judgment In inc favor of ot plaintiffs This Thin hlll Judgment lo iii II by tire the court for tor tire thu reason that the time assessor In him tl making tho tire tho on ore the time prop 1101 city cly aid selling the I ire did thu li II not riot comply cump with wih the tire provisions of ur ortho tho statute hi III that matter flatter mater The rime drum oilin opinion ion Sc IS as urn Itten by h Justice and In hr by hy Chief Justice Bal Uns Balkin kin and Justice Nr THI The rime Judgment of the tho boot In 0 court III In Inthe time the enl of tint tin of uC the tine incur mem lem lt lt 1 ns of the Church of oC Jesus Christ of uC Saints re residing In the time Fifteenth ward of oC tire th Salt Rail lil Uiko Inlo stake of mC Aon Joui n against Helen helene Watson appellant wren was aK reversed 1 with Instructions I ii et to iii grunt Brant n a n new lew trial The rite auctIon action was IH In might to quiet ulet tithe tto to a 1 of property In inc thus this city and alit Judg Judgment rendered An Arc ment 1 for was taken to the tire court COUlt mid a it I new nets 1111 was al granted Upon Ulon tine the second t 1111 of tire the CIBe the time court to allow evidence to tn be he In Introduced on other inane thouc I Indicated 1 In Inc tine the opinion i ion tuna again rendered for fol plaintiff in tIff ami anui tills tic is Judgment j In I a re reversed I versed by tho time court which holds In lIre Its 11 opinion that lint when a I now trial Is It granted all ni tine the facts In ira con necton with tire the case should he be gone gOlo Into In the tire evidence Introduced Tho Time opinion was wai written by h i Justice Me Ic Corty Carty radIi and concurred In hr by hy Chief Justice and amid Ju Justice |