OCR Text |
Show THE EVENING NEWS. eixox.' oronGE q. "He'rabdrcd bard to show that Mldlia and Ethiopia were the same country, and t Lore fore, that Moses Ethiopian and MJdianltlsh wives were one and the same person, and that Moses was a m nogamlst. LThe.Doctor thinks Josephua good authority? yet that historian In forms us that Mosea married a daugh ter of the king of Ethiopia, and that, too, before he fled to Mldlan and took Jethrrya daughter. He plainly shows that, In the days of Moaei, Mldlan and Ethiopia were distinct landaj as separ ata aa the United State and Mexico now are. This brings us to another point that he endeavored to make respecting baa tardy; He said: "The only child recog- uizeuasa oaeiara oy Jew lab law la a chili) born of a Jew and a Pagan wo Pper ties, which wiuproance eucn results. Al ; have therefore eauwianea Ood T... I gave was a polygamic nation when (hum tfcVlawa which I hSVO QUOted, laWS to. govern and regulate and' Baonogww polygamic was founded fa fanSeaV The nation ana it was of In Jacob, the days polygamy continued In polygamy until they becameand very powvery numerous, mnnmmnilii fkmily a man with one wire. Now if Ood gave la we to a people having these two forms or marriage in the wilderness, He would adapt such laws to all. He would not take up isolated instances here one wife, but and there of a man having He would adapt His laws to the whole; to both tbe polygamic and monogamio forma, of marriage throughout all Israel. reverend But we are iniormed by , the Twtnr that the laws riven for the regula- tinn of matters in the Dolyjramio 'form of marriage bear upon tho face of it the condemnation of polygamy. And toijusti assertion he refers to the laws that fr hisbeen have passed In Paris to regulate the social evil; and to the excise laws passed In our own country to regulate intemperance; and claims that these laws for. the of evils are condemnatory of regulation to the crimes which they apply. But. when Parisians pass laws to regulate the social evil they acknowledge it as a crime. When the Inhabitants of this country pass lawsde-te regulate intemperance, they thereby nounce It as a crime. - And when Qod gives laws or even when human legislatures make penal laws, they denounce as crimes the! acts against which those laws are directed, and attaoh penalties, to them for disobedience. When.the law was given of Ood against murder. It was denounced as a crime by the very penalty attached, which was death; and when the law- was was given againsttheadultery its enormity the criminal marked by punishment was to be atoned to death. It was a crime,and was so denounced when the law was given. Ood gave laws to rerulato these things in has regulated many Israel; but because lie crimes abominable and by law, has He great no right to regulate that which is good and moral as well as that which is wicked and immorial? For instance, God introduced the wlth notl ttErsxX'wiarcTtoirrot.'Tii OAKYT" ..... rtuaw M Dleeaaate . rrassaaa Dr. J. P. irewmasuCIiaplala ;PP"n t " sa TtiAti tm a part and parcel of the same code, while the word wife'' inserted in me margin uvk, and cannoti by any possible rule, of be extorted i from1 the original in connection withthe secondform of transla-- T by' him In whichbutthetheHebrew word transtefV? dwelling occurs, is a disMr, of entirely marriage, "duty" woS-- n, inter-nretatlo- ferred to. Does not the learned Dr kni the difference between two Hebrew- word U Why shottid Klag James? literal transla- Or tfa what was hi object In referrino. t" 4ono for aside set tion Wrife" knd Msister'tbe saw word elsewhere in the Scripture- that" don Thlnt aad ClesIdg Day nece3Jv to another?" Because they .. riot AVAn oocnr in the text unHni- '"""werii. z wo au rfiHflrence: in i r.m Ttiw. j AarvstlS, 1S70. e words other seven passages whore the TROT. OBSOV JBATT. bbs. a.m !( blIab yjosiahW.Gi there U a occur, ishah the in Sacred of Liter, Theology ir Lamas awd QximjcxKir. .. ' ,"I nam lfif) it rBfc., ... Sow Vata(ViHncrM We hkTS aaiembled Snraelf ea in this vast coupled together. THE THREE DAT.V Hebrew word and to the faig somethisg to beUrA passage p7 verse contains ishah xxxi: 10, and translates very h.ntAf It Uls:-."3- o,h congregation in the third session of our to take Into' consideration the elahotah twice, signifying to coupletogether UtlOD,"-Md- oty of marriage." , r Tub discussion of the question "Does one to anotner, tno sane institution of Divinity of a very important curtains the is cohabitation-then ihu marriage,", mm need-itext. tbe Bible. Tbe ineaUowr this that are thf Bible rJanction PoirgMSf?" be yoa bare al Ood commands a man who takes annti.? being used fifth verse of the same chapter, and there wife, not .to diminish the duty of cohabits the ready heard, is "Does the Bible Sanction Profeeeor Orson Pratt and Dr. we ha e the loops ofthe curtains joined to tlon with tbe first. Would Ood commanci" Polygamy?'' Many arguments have alJ. P. Newman, Chaplain of the U. S. tne nom- undiminished cohabitation" witha woman ready been adduced. on the aide of the gether one to another, the nowu in Next ago and caso also aide the of the nega on. inative closed yesterday afternoon, affimaMve, being expressed.! and not marrieo? 23d merely betrothed 11th and 9tb. allotted-t1st Uva. K.aV'aI. one :This is chanter. afternoon hour Ia a few moments left let mft have While I to JT,he arrangement, eordiug argu me in the. discussion. to brinr forth still verses; and these three passages give the refer you to Hosea. I wish all of you when tbeafHrmative and the nega the farther evidence, which will close the derendering of those sam words, couplingxuou go home, to read the second chapter of or tne cneruoim cue to anouier. Date, so xar as the amrmatlve is concerned; Su tive appear in our columns, having been wings yod will find with regard to to be followed by the Reverend Dr. of Erekiel and Hosea's and then to the 3d; chapter divorced his first wife go again on manl" full. in The having audience reported close the dis which ' will - finally 13th verse, and the wings of the living creaNewman, that no such thing of her whoredoms, ' ' ' TU'la he bases on the law of Athena. cusslon. tures were joined together one4 to another. is recorded as stated by Mr.Newman yesteSaturday was a much larger one than U a questlon,or in other words, But in the text under consideration no such rday. TheIiOrd tells Hosea to go an d speak Friday'; andyesterday there were fully that those children were bastards who Is Polygamy an institution of the Bible; an institution noun in the nominative case occurs; and to his brethxen, (not to his son); to his sis. eleven thousand persons present the were not born of native Athenians. established as we have already shown, by hence the English translators concluded to tors, (not his daughter,) of the house or Divine Authority: established by law by each word its literal translation. give people irom the surrounding settle What, then, according to this definition, command: Israel, and tell them what the Lord win be must and of law was given to prevent quarrels do; course, The hence, that he may not acknowledge them any nieuta having come from their homes were the children of Mosea and the sanctioned which are apt' to arise among blood rela- longer by the great Divine Lawgiver, as a wife. Hosea bore the word of the to listen to the discussion. We Ethiopian and the MIdianltlsh women whose words are recorded in the Bible. tions. We might look for quairela on the Lord to Israel whom his own two wives I was challenged by the Revother aide between women who were not represented, saying should have been pleased to have and those of Boaz and Ruth? Were Yesterday that their whoredoms, facts in their wickedness and erend Doctor Newman to forth any related by blood but what are the idolatries had kinson Colfax present at they' kept out of 'the congregation for evidence whatever to provebring relablood between that there were to relation quarrels dled the of the Lord anger against them. more tnan two polygamlst xamuies in sn this discussion. lie would have had an ten generations?" tions? Go back to Cain and Abel. Who discussed the subject so far 1 Having a was Israel in the dnrinir of aoioarn their time Abel? blood of was It it spilled the leave now with all candid persons to judge. Respeptiug Abraham be wished his the wilderness. At least this is what I un opportunity of properly estimating blood relation, his brother. Who was it Here isit the law of Qod; here is the command the act, for which his admirers praised hearers to understand that H agar was derstood the gentleman to say. I shall now that cast Joseph Into the pit to perish with of the Most High, general in its nature, nol to forth forth him the afterwards brinr proof. him so much last summer1 the making tbe only worn n whom Abraham had proceed and dragged hunger, can be nor it limited, proved to be so. There sThe stalls tios of Israel in the days of Moses rrom ms aen ana eoia mm as a aiave to is no law against it, but of a lew remarks to a few score persons children by, excepting Sarah and snow it stands as immovetnat there were or males, over twenty f the country able as the Bock of Ages, antKwill stand trading through, Feraons blood . in front of the Tlownsend Ilouae one Ketiirah. He would have us believe years or age, (Numbers; 1st chapter 4Utn relations. Who slew the when all on the earth and the erth even in. He had caused, or at least that li t was Sarah's anxiety to help the verse.) seventy sons of Gideon upon one stone? It itself shallthings away. pass was one. of their own brothers that hired "Eren all they that were numbered, were six eutlered, the Impression to prevail that Lord to keep his promise that led Sarah hundred thousand, and three thousand, and fire men to do it. Who was it that rebelled he had performed a wonderfully brave to give him her maid as a wife, and that hundred and fifty. OB. J. P. NEWSUX Said : against King David and caused him with ten his and wives all was admitted yesterday afternoon, by household, excepting act In making that speech indeed poor Abraham took the maid because it It 1'espected Umpires, akd Ladies am to flee out of Jerusalem? It Gektlxmex: a two were Dr. there and concubines, that Newman, "bearded the lion in his den ;" when was Sarah's arrangement; but that he half millions of Israelites. Now I shall take waa his his own son Absa . had to y cur lom. Who in the family of I thatheard, prior to my coming Quarreled thtj truth was, if he had made his wishes afterwards sent her away by divine the position; that the females the itnootr ' wa, opponent distinguished my. city Israelites were far more numerous than law of circumcision and; gave commands Jacob? Did Bllhah quarrel with ZUpah? certain and eminent in known, instead of selecting a time when command, and then conformed to Dr. the mathematics, ZUor Bllhah with Leah Did No. males; I mean that portion of them that regulatiagit; shall we, therefore ssyj accordquarrel confirms that reputation. Unuohody excepting a few stragglers, and olewmau's idea of piety and had no were over twenty years of age. I assume ing to the logic of the gentleman, that cir- pah? ' No such thing is recorded. Did fortunately, however, is incorrect in bU a few other persons were present to more wives; in other words,experienced this for this reason, that from, the birth of cumcision was condemned by the law of Ood, RsiahAl nnarral with either of the hand statements. First, he he assumes that the slavMosea down until tbe time that the Israel because it was regulated by the law of God? maidens? There is not a word concerning ing of all the male children of the Hebrewi hear him, he might have had the t change of heart. But, unfortunately ites were broeurbt out of eighty Thst would be bis lorio, and the natural con the matter. The little, petty dimcuities continued through eighty years; but he Tabernacle to speak in, and the whole for the symmetry of this theory, the years had elapsed. TbeErypcsome destruction of tbe clusion according to his logic . Again, when (wturmd hAlwMtn the two sisters, blood was To do this failed has And this law was his to produce theHeproof. Bible says. Genesis 25th chapter, 6th male children had commenced before the Ood introduced the pasaover. He gave laws relations, Rachel andXioah. assumes it; where people as listeners. starting point. birth of. Moses; how many years before, I how it should be conducted. Does that con- was probably given to prevent sucn vexa- is the prooCeither or in Bible in the Josephus,? Tu foi demonstrated by, this discus versei know not. The order ol King Pharaoh was demn the Passover as being immoral because tions between blood relations between And until be can prove that the destruction "Bat unto tho sons of tho concubines. which to destroy every male child. All the peo- regulated and slater. bIoo, aud which we view as being of far law? But, still closer home sister male children went on for eighty year;. ' the marginal of thethis Abraham had, Abraham rave rifts, and sent ple, subject to this ruler, were command- God rave by proved effectually Having to the laws rerulate monogamlc d.scussion than the I say a vision. argument has no more foundation higher importance them away from Itaao his son, (while he yet ed to see that they were destroys and form of marriare. Does that prove that reading to be false. I will now defy not than he makes another blunoae is has that itself, thrown Into the river Nile. IIow long a monoramy is condemned by the law of God only, the learned geutlenian, .but all the der: the 303,550, Then always existed, uveoi eastwara unto tne east country." men above the number but which has been repeatedly denied, great destruction continued is because thus regulated? Oh. that kind of world of Hebrew acholars.to rind any word twenty years of age, mentionedof in this case, Was Sarah still anxious to help the period this hot to if we translated one be "wife" if suppose that male loric will never dol . in the oririnal unknown; to war; they were not the were men to namely, that free speech' on certain Lord to keep His promlse,and not satis- child to every two hundred and fifty perNow. then, we come to that passage in ishah be nrst translated "one." (The speak- total populationgo of the Jewish nation, and fifteen ho informed had sons was waa would here only topics; especially polygamy, did not fied .with giving him Hagar, gave him the 18th chapter and the 18th er annually destroyed, it Leviticus, stands up here friend mathematical my yet the number of ten thousand TflnA: the Dasaare that waa an often refer minutes left.) exist in Utah. The spectacle witnessed these other concubines? or was this an amount to declares whole male tbe that and fifteen minutes. soon to informed have tell am This would in red to in the gentleman's reply yesterday I I only begin above of age con at this discussion was thoroughly anxiety of Keturah on the same point? Searly. population years twenty ie uhTerenoe between the numbers of afternoon. I was very glad to hear the I was not aware I had spoken a quarter of sisted of 303,550, whereas it is a fact that this nave each females. 1 to tms Ten males thousand and sub too leave do time. We state to not snail tbe it refer year gentleman this passage. The law. unique. strongly Strange that the ladies in those days would not did includo males. all the number two to each one be male child accordinr to Ja.injr James' translation, as ject and proceed to another 1 wbeu we say that we do not believe it should be so anxious to give their has-ban- hundredonly again the 22,273 first born de not reHow and The next subject to which shall call your Then the we heard yesterday afternoon, roads thus; many persons. fifty number of families in Israel at caa be paralle ed In any part of Christ-eudorpresent unMoses.or of wives and ooncubines. The would this make from the birth a nan tnou taae m wire to her sis attention is in regard to tno general or "Weitber for that time, many of the first born were amount to 800.000 ter to vex her, to unoover her nakedness. limited language of the. laws given in the dead. These are Ia what other plsce, or among wives among the Latter-da- y eighty years? It would Saints re females the blunders the gentleman do of But males. above have a the that which I besides the other In her If has made I a manquoted; That various passages and I challenge, him tu what other people would a church, semble them marvelously in this res- not wish to take advantage in this argushall entice was the law according to Ulnr James man shall commit rape, if and prove that he is the contrary produce be or too hall ment a or furnished or number. do I the a man a shall this, chapel high that, by assuming maid, if gratuitously translation. My friend, together with Doc pect. But Dr. Newman denies that these not numerical of guilty it one half, which will still tors Dw.ight and Ka wards, and several other, is tho language of these passages. he denies the assertion madeblunders. Then to auy opponent, and the people sus- Abraham was a polygamlst, and Dr. will diminishmore yesterday that leave female thatf males. This other oe'ebrated commentators,- disagree Will any person pretend to say that a mar400,000 be forward more not could there brought pend Dullness and labor, at a very busy Newman ought to be authority; we sup would be one male .destroyed each year witb mat lntrepretation: ana somebody. ried man is not a man? And if a married than one or two instances of polygamy in the season of the year, and assemble from pose he is in some places. And this out of every five hundred persona. The I know not whom, some unauthorised per person is a man, it proves that th law is apthe from time the Israel of Hebrew; history over so of rests and to if it females, then, age son, has inserted in the margin another in plicable married men, twenty years the surrounding settlements to listen brings us to another point. they entered Canaan. Egypt to the time would be 603.450, added to 400,000 surplus terpretation; learned friend to prove that it is left with; my and tbe in recollect, margin that? He has attempted We have heard of the wickedness and women, making in all 1,005,550 women over not in the text. It is argued that this in- limited. Moreover, the passage from the Has heitdisproved patiently to an assailant of a doctrine which a mathematical problem, which they hold sacred? In what other bagnios of Washington, how that many twenty years or age. Tbe ohildren, then,' terpretation in the margin must be correct margin inLevitioua was quoted by Dr.New-ma- n problem isbytased on error: his--, premises are law a under which to aa make of the fundamental twenty years age by up while King James' translators must have great therefore his conclusions are false. place could eleven thousand people be men occupying high places debase them two and a half millions, would be 892.900, been all the other passages were to be overturned. wrong,didn't mistaken. the that recollect Now, he turn to King James' translaWhy gathered together, who would listen as selves and corruption reigns too widely. the total population of Israel being laid great commentate rs who have thus altered But it has .failed; and, therefore, the other tion? will to one polygamist, I at 2500,000 people. stand good unless that is Caleb. help him by me, King James' translation were monogam passages quoted quietly as the audience did yesterday but after hearing the arguments of this down didn't he start with old Why Now. then, for the number of families lata. found learned tne can else he were So by the translators of the Bible; something down us name after and Caleb and to the condemnation by an opponent popular preacher from there,' we cease constituting this population., .The families go givo were monogamists. But with re gentleman to support his forlorn hope. too, they, date name of and date after the gam ists n of a religious doctrine as flrmiy bellev to wonder at this debauchery. He asserts having males, over ene month old, gard to the true translation of this passage. Perhaps we may hear quoted in the fu- recorded in the history of the poly whiie Jews see Numbers 3rd chapter and 43rd to the my remarks the passage that ed In arid as widely understood as the that Abraham, despite his commerce with numbered 22,275. Families having ho male is ha been argtied by my learned friend ture wilderness? and were in Ladies the they the Hebrew. the original Hebrew. king of Israel was not to multiply wives gentlemen, he had none to give, and theredootrloe of patriarchal marriage is by more 'than one living wife at a time, children over one month old we may sup- that The a to himself! was law. word the That little different from something the assertion made yesterday is true, d of signifies pose to have been in the ratio of which Is contained in King James multiply is construed by thoso opposed to fore Saints? We mentally was cot n polygamlst that he did no the the Latter-da- y that; the sojourn of the children ol that class of families, which would translation. These are hla words, as will be to mean thst twice one make two, Israelduring polygamy wilderness drew the contrast yesterday between have wives by Qod's command and per makeforojer in the there is but one in 7.424 additional families. Add these found in his sermon preached was and hence that he not to multiply stance of Waahinsrat n recorded. males we with to and polygamy the 2273 the treatment the elders of this church mission; but had wives and concubines this same subject. "But in verse 18 wives, or in other words, that he was not Now we come to the law that I laid down hare the sum total of 29,697 as the number ton,upon law against polygamy is given: "Neither to take two. But the command was also the Christian and in violation of Qod's law. Jacob, also, of had received In the families in Israel, Now, in order to yesterday "Neither shall thou take one wife thou take a wife to her sister;' or as the given that the future king of Israel was not to free cities and commonwealths, not for had his wives contrary to the same law. favor the monogamists argument, and give shalt I reaffirm that the translation is. norses to mere 'Thou not one take shalt than wives. in another." marginal reading any multiply the still will all the margirris perfect to a word. He labors them advantage posslblewe wire to another.' And this is sus Twice one make two again. Was the future to show that God denouncing existing Institutions and Caleb, also, the mighty prince, pre-edoes not mean what H add to this number to make it even, SOS tained by Cookson. bv BishoDrendering of Israel not to one more have Jewell and by king than, That ductriues, but for advocating the pure inent in Israel for his fidelity; the only families more, makinrthirty thousand fami Drs. Edwards and DwighL" four (eminent "one wife to an other,' says. phrase, horse? The idea is ridiculous! The future be one woman to rendered In all. Now comes another species of monogamists, interested in sustaining mono king of Israel was not to may equally principles of the gospelthe first prin- one, besides Joshua, who left Egypt a lies not them; multiply one or to wife sister. her on The very Divide founded this data: calculation another, to have them in multitude that is, only to same Accordingto Dr. d wards, the words ciples aud we thanked God that a day man and lived to enter Canaan, was twenty-fiv- e is used in the other seven pashundred thousand' persons by gamy. phrase wo sucn which as to a saw wife taxe translate to 'a are her number sister uod proper bad, at last, come when the Latter-da- y sages named by Dr. D wight. : For example equally a transgressor; besides numbers 22273 flrtUborn males, and we find one first- - found in the Hebrew, but eight times. Now. give them. ... L 9, etc. He admit' Exodus 26, 112 to a male persons. What we t have not been favored with these every. Saints could set the world an example of others whose names we need not bern We might next refer you to the uncle of the these for in a translation But divide passages to be correct. family we monogamist large no aooess authorities had to them. iiuui's dead husband, old tfoaz, who repre tn this as In other respects. mention. Yet, in praying, the Doctor 2,600,000 persona by 30,000 and the quotient Ilere in these have is correct in these passages, why is it it If as vmrv mountain la wildait not sented nearest nimseir kin. the ' persons In "a family. difficult to being correct in the other? His very admUsiou There are a few points in Dr. New offeri his petitions to the God of Abra gives eighty-thre- e get books.' In each passage they There was another nearer who' had the Di not to to pieces his argument Why then, families knocks been have these monog rerer to inanimate man's argument yesterday to which ham; and Jacob, to the Ood who called Suppose that is. in each vine right' to take her, and this other hap- does he labor to create the impression that after deducting husband and wife, we or me eigne piacea objects: amic, wnere be to the brother of the words are pened Boaz, perhaps a the Hebrew ishau means we wish to make reference, because we Abraham ms menu ana whose highest have the very respectable number of eighty-en- e fonnd. We have woman, or wife? search ed them in th little older. Josephus tells us, according to What is the to each monogamies wife. ' If ueorew ana can rerer of the travail of hi3 soul? think that U would be doing Professor promise to mankind Is that they shall we children object the to learned eaoh you oldest this that pe broth The word ahoot, he contends, means gentleman, assume tne numoera or the males and wnere each-timsister; was er a man. mamea Pratt aud the cause he advocated great go, If faithful to Him, to Abraham's females we admit ami Suppose was they to have been equal, makinr no r?ier w sister itself, is a word which means a but Boaz not man-iaknow brotheri SUCU his siuujeuta wgetner, juiutu bosom! Now if Abraham and Jacob allowance for the destruction of the male in- - wings, loops, curtains, injustice to suffer them to pass In relation, and a generic relation. fca, and;a!gnlfy when he represented , him si tne nearest of specificwoman ic sister to every other woman, lence. Dr. Newman said, yesterday, could thus have commerce with women, Ctnts. we shall then Lave to increase the coupling Every together. The gentleman reads .m auu uau. uis nrut oeiora mmr . Ana even and of under to X children the gentleman to meet me on age. years twenty challenge tne keep the not brother "Thou one shalt passage take wife acknowledges his right, and says 'I plead for more time; my friends outside of divine and lawful wedlock, rood the number of two and a half millions. to another." at in the newspapers of your tune, any and , understands it aa in voir- - jo iwnz; tnou my ngmv to tnyseii.' paperor elsewhere would still make eighty-onchildren ing tne UKenesa or the.' Hebrew of this plead for more time; but time was deni- as Dr. Newman says they had, and still This one the1 upon city He to to had TM rirht hsr another. lnsrrv thing reaffirm text. reanlrm lt in the hearI ed us, I am therefore restricted to an be called the friend of Ood and have to each ofusthe 80.000 monoramie households. tav we "fy arrive at wiuwi u wrrwt, xui aoes tne language the' assistance of Josenhnsconnec- forbid, Now examine dates let these in of this learned reaffirm it in as ing the ahd ' gentleman, it men were tak that the married xnsrgln proves expresses It, hour." A hearer, or. a reader of this re theif names associated with His who tion with polygamy. If we suppose the required . a. ..a a these of the or that as it is one wife Hebraists,, hearing Nor We have t compiy wren tne law. a , nave no mrther Sard ' ' ing mark would Imagine that Dr. Newman rules, eternity, is it any wonder that average numbers of wives to hare been tne is in the 'the ttrue' margin rendering, privilege according to the Tales or r. time to .remark , on this naasarer I wish new seven. In each household.there t eles "neither shalt thou take1 one wife to aft of debate, which have been read this to examine namely did cot have all the time he wanted to where ministers contained in passage that is jaoor wno teacn such may have been men who had though no wife at alL But supposing that is incorrect. to apply to the original Hebrew. J!"? h.Tegar4 to divorces,' and also in another." discuss this question; which would monstrous doctrine men have mistres- and there may have .. been some who afternoon, f before woros-4-tb-e I passJEi;on,' tofaremind yfirstu wnac are. ueorew me,' permit tne original jSUDject, Malachi. of this fact, he refers ataiacni,. onineeaame. one there had but and been hare wife; be simply untrue. Professor Pratt's ses, frequent houses' of thin in his used.Velahahel-ahotamay h are that lo tikkah; or the. lierd . by the, mouth,, of Mal- and outers rrom one up to say thirty this was , Informs the , naying V when achL speechi.to tranalated and 'LarA neonle trans the we vile-nesas that have literally fraarginfvthe,,margin" the;, sf commit every other species of propositions, 11 e wives, yetjlf we'average them at seven wives posed is "neitner- anait thou tax orrect is but then here. not v and, it hated there, wife to away, He avf the reason were for each disputant to oc " Oh! Yes, follow Abraham and each, we wouia men nave one husband. her slater,"- veiahah heing translated by why-- putting a work is rule both will not that way s: poor wife should not be nut awavL 'NM f seven wives and seventy-fiv- e :ehildren to rrom .wnen correct newwaats: to the or an a James an hour translators half 'a wife.", word against polygamy m either passage quota cupy King alternately, Jacob's exam plea as I teach them - when raake no the averaire number of so. but want not to do tn Vmargin;" But translated I her there iscertam ia trans n being la introduced to sister;" Newman chose hour alternately. Dr. reasoning take! 'mistresses, keep them as long as three in the family, ia a polycamlo house lated -followed! marrfnl from rtho auoted and Il6 I show a wife wniie that should not be put away.- In tikxah is translated neitner," u ' illustrious example. the latter. But Professor Pratt plaeed you please, only take care 'that when hold. This would give an average of over by iung James' transUtors'shslt-thOue tne juora made oae,: that ia a JhisAnd Degmmng ten to children 210.000 each of. the' pelce taow.' my friends.suprosinr that tkc". no limit upon the length of time that you get old and the fires of life burn low take." Tney have certainly riven a literal wire tor, Adam .that Joe might not be alone. text means wives.- - when? we deduct-thramie poly was translation. to just what he sayai namely "naifx the Hebrew. and you Woman Appeal given to man tor a companion. tkershalt thott . should be occupied in the discussion. a aI 1 . l as! Jacob did, eight years before yon 30,000 husbands from the 60350 men over wiu take a wife unfa her sister worn una oooura. tav zor ana uxiKut uata otuer noly Vex ner, nunareda ua,ue protect years old we have &7X5u unmarried men This Dr. Newman did himself, lie dle-jnthat: is t thov renderiag, herf' not have connexion with them, ro In 'supposing the Bible, and is translated purposes, but not to be; put away for trivial and he asserts we deduct 210.000 the Israel. in andiJie ia a . .Hebraist. I If married is .it wife." The word ahotah tranalated by causes: and it was causa of condemr-atJoin crouod that the discussion should and nrepent and aay you wish you had women from the . total of 1,00350 over King fend bronrht the nroof veaterda-- that aws-translators those catwtfW hiA James davs a man for to occurs "a slater," hold three days commence on'Frl not tlone it, and all will be right. Abra twenty years of age. we have 783,350 left. hundreds of times in the Bible; law of Hoses 1 not. kept by the Mor ana is trana- - But there is not a word in Malachi condemn this in other words there are men in Tour to mons, nn This would all enonrh be the supply iatea "sister. iiut are ,tnes'the Only atory of a man marrying more than ono wife. very midst day. end on Sunday. . Now; we 11a- - ham and Jacob have got to heaven,' and married men with one wife who have married-listers- . Where each, ssus leaving auo the tne law respecting divorces, was the renderings? Ishah. i only gives mot solemn 'denunciation of teued to bis remarks yesterday, which why:not you? ; ' still a balance of 20,000 unmarried females translations, gentleman's followed should Is It that when' awar abot has their: for wires they another pat by "wife" la of etod'r lawf' Why did he live old maids or enter into polygamic rendering. That la when the' violation"we hve tiuoted. and we viewed them we too ' severe in drawing these to followed nay uusresoss tnan wat-o.fornication: not votcc-and' i .v...-- his lift households. vindicate the divine Ap i u,t ".i) i o tooai be was a wire that and tbat sister" there is another rendering puaway as designed to create a faUe Impression. conclusions?. Wo think not. Wa think word of disapproval The law guaranteeing the rights of the Jby 'Butnotfceolitary to rive a donbla would; commit t adultery. Jesus save. saw? no iTranslators have rirht . 'uttered! a ; Yesterday nrnnnnnn wnicn nas, oeen referred to in translation to the same Hebrew word, in the in; the 50r chapter, that he that putteth Auther potut Vhat created a painful the premises warrant them. At any rate nnuDom, curse s s . a he. "cursod.i! t of other our. discussion 'includes to ii thaf confirms not same paras e; ii tney translate vetsuaa op away his wife for any other cause than, for- the words of. this-- , la w seuratiou throughout the audience- was we are thankful that sucn uoctnne is so tbose portionsfirst-born male . children in they ta Idoo them." Does are not at liberty to translate; the same nicauon causes ner, to commit adultery; the light, burlesque sty la la which he rarely taught In the hearing of the youth Israel that is,, one first-bor- n rest male child to word in the netLtho,curscf his a huabahd Then is guilty accomplice, the uponkim, same over again and call ;ndtoupon the him I people. choose gave no every 112 persons in Israel; taking the popu it wife, This Dr.phrase and hla alluded to the words of Jesus. . The of this land. wife' trnts he liberty if is he away some or justly other Edwards, this text condemned polygamy, or oy our learned friend. monogamist has done, and inserted this false guilty of adultery himself, ; the same a a Whether Docorsaid: fair to call every lation as represeniea Is it Another Why, thty aoxnewhere point: m whether uvft it oonfedsrate is condemned, av man;for marrying murder in mar ihlmselt IUI1UOQI, translation In the margin. a in..., uti such ' hat object two slstersf J Aa an adulterer he has no he must4tatrA..hrt;ft ih quote a passage that If a man forsake his man a monogamist '. whose marriage Is Thus we see tnat there was a law given to translator had in deceiving the public derer. must right ta a toe ngnn oi we be best known to himself; he probably was Uke another wife; her has not itbe right to horns Of the dilemma are" befb?ehim. For wife, he shall have a ha ad red. Well he not mentioned?;.. Why should it not, regulate to vers2,uw urswxra maie cnudren take even one wife, i , Hla rirht ;ia to ,he Bach withe equal ; propriety, be asserted that ing by a seal to find some law against atoned ought to go on forsaking.in Israel, giving them a double portion of actuated to death; to auffar he penalty of here in the presence of Almighty Qod and to concluded manufacture the and a man would keep the Almlgh ty busy they were polygamlsts? If the founders the goods aad laberttancesj or their fathers. polygamy, withuts uwa in the and uiaaio ot aauitery..-- uonaequent-ly- , aim noiy angeisi and before - this . intelligent it word margin, place these forth baa no right to even life Itself he congregation he admits that- in this church, let i Having he If brought women statistics, for him." out any original Hebrew word to represent it. of the' naUon' were1 polygamlata," ; the us ioraiew momenta examine more creating to ne has is But the case of such and with this people, Qod's holy law is set at rendered when closely right alone, standing sifrj a man, who hasa wife. The' passage thus ridiculed Is found heads of the tribes" aona "of polygamlsta. tnese results, .now can any one assume Ahot, ishah. is rendered another. become adnitArn h defiance. What respect;UiereXare, can we when preceded by to have been monogamlc, and be con- The sufHx ah, attached to ahot, ia translated putting away hla wife, aadanhas for. the gentleman's t argument, drawn in Mat hew 9ih chapter,' 27 30, also woold not .the nation follow their, ex Israel no right to have sistent? I honored that, presume from (ahot-ahmy the are 2S no ) has rendered both marry another, teachings of Closes, in i support of 30, and reads: together application, nor has jLuae Sth chapter, ample? and if because polygamous mar friend, notwithstanding, his great " desire "kerf, in.--. .:.y k.f t. ;.mJ. m.w.i rf.M the argument drawn, from, 1 appiica-tio- m it any MTbsu answered Peter and maid unto riages are not frequently mentioned, and earnestness to overthrow tbe Divine ahot b rendered anotherJ its sufflx al' re to . the man who keeps his wife and xie reiers us to tne muiupucauou ol norscsIn not-evidences of forsaken favor we have would and all, Behold, polygamy, takes more or another. The law mran-raim. tr hI suppose a;noking may have ohe horse or, the noun neither are any kind of marriages, shall eay to uiis people tnat one wire could bring-fort- i presents rhtr properly" followed thee: what ahall we hare there- it ne learned! there is special rule; tnxi there is stands. tot wnicn aUter two; , will it be "r 18 Leviticus i phrase that there opponent, in and la, concluded, therefore, eighty-on- e children, i We can depend then read: Veishah (one) fore? snows waa that rule'aa to the number of wives. to in no were .. hn H (sister , special polvramv marriages? these proofii opon these, biblioalataw another) lo (neither) tikkah (shalt thpu Uke) waatoe kept within the upon And Jesus said unto them, Veriry I say t Neither shall the king multiply wives. God, Uiom y, of circle, the further tisUoa. ir be assumes that the males and which, when transposed, reads thus: ilfeither who were not blood Space precludes, me, notice one unto you. That ye wbtcn have followed in the relations. gave the Hrs man law beginning to of critiare or were man females ia number, that a halt thou take on titter to another,, This XJoncernln the open points that equal r&arjy in the regeneration when toe Son' and that Christ wife, Paul and sustain marof duty - j ; r Israel was a monogamio people, then, let form of translation agrees with the rendering riage; pccurrlng inphrase, shall sit in the throne of hi glory, ye also cism, and we mutt forbear. fj.; the naaasffk MTfamaW as j binding upon us. And now supposing Mr. Newman show how these great and seal! sit upon twelve thrones, Judging the to the same Hebrew words or phrase ia take another '.wife,1 her. Jood, her raiment that that is not accepted as a law, what then? ' en , Tax Oxaxts. are nbw"oa .exVdiUoa,at wonderful householders could be produced Sr seven other twelve tribes of sraeL f marriage shall te not dim- Why there, is : no limit; to a the number of passages of Scripture, re1?1 And every one that hath ; forsaken the Social Ball, and they are as large as they In Israel, If there were only two polygamla ferred to by Dr. Newman and JSd wards.3 inish." The ooadltlon t here .referrA wives, none at alL How manv shall a man Jr. i. families lathe nation.' It would reonire (See Exodusjtxvl, .8,6; Kzekiel L t XU 23: sometlmea more brethren, or slaters, or father, or are said to be, light feet high, both the rn-- somethinr house, or have? Seven twenty, fifty, aixtytibundred' than mere betrothal. ?.Mt more wonderful than that herb motner. or wire, or cnuaren, or tauua, ior tleman and i somewhere quote sr. passage tnat aomeuung that Why, the are well they individual if a man- forsake called "vumdmJU," referred to by Dr. It will be seen that the latter forni of trans- naa been .not abowlng lady. They proportiontake, shall receive a hundred-Xof- ed aad my name's his wife 'he shall have amerely betrothed, previously 'poaitively eaormoua. All who waat Newman in bis rejoinder to mr renl ta lation rives creciielr the tame i ldsL' : and shall Inherit everlasting life. ' . . bUt LhA hundred.-to goon forsakla actUallV in mrr1vl .t.fo Weil; he oughta nunurea MBut many that are first shall be last; to see the largest spscune&s of humans extant him In the NtwTork Herald. I think: ha that given by the English translators in the ne w of rorsage ior he ng: wui see ir Meniiear Joseph aad JXiss will not be able to find, in our day an herb text. It also should go ana theduty marriage la clearly expresa- have tenten forsafce and the isst Maff to first." with the twelve he if andagrees creced. .What thousand Is; tfiet. meaning of jthe orWyJ edj y, Swaa. They are here for three dayi only. DISCX!. twn S-na- te, iuitun i f IheP. S. aeaate. L dis-eusaio- a; J - i WJR . ! el-aho- Uh - Ex-JU.o- atu "iw " n ; , o 1 . be-cau- ; - , Vice-Preside- nt - -- : blood-relatio- n, to-d- ay ! to-d- ay da o. life-tim- e." to-da- y, , - e . 1 flnt-bor- ana-we- re r, one-thir- . first-bor- so-call- ed m ' - ', - - - , I . -- . ; w fr tney-occur, e it-Di- d ; , , : e , - - S r m ' m - m - . . . I Ill-fam- , - e,' ( . already-published- , - , a - et-aho- tah eio-ht- : . - n e 1 do or-time- 1 A . . m -- s - , : n - , r u-miA-ii r ? - r -- - . m - 1 - , -- ; .r . nrst-Dor- n, - i T ; Sc" : . , -- -- -- ! ; - t - " h . .xlin 4It to-da- . 1 . ; . - i ..55 ! d. v . - - -- -- j f - |