Show I The Bnthwell Case Toy Uie Uothwell case was again up bsfore JudgeAndcrv and the examination of CC Itch anls was resumed thisiuorninJIe testified that Bothwell insisted that he had Uie authority to trw war rat on Uie canal companys treasury treas-ury without any vote or direction of the board of director thrl he should he l permitted appoint ernployand d iar at his pleasure all the officers and employes Jof the company com-pany without consulting Uie r and should 0 entrusted with the entire construction of the canal This the board of directors refused to permit and appointed an executive committee t look after lie business of the corporation during dur-ing the adjournment of the board of dtrccioir MrTlicharJsdenied emphatically phatically each and every allegation of Uie complaint charging the directors direc-tors with mUcouduct and conspiring with Jarvis and cnPrng injure Botliwdl and testified that liothwell requested ftssrs Adnm Armstrong anti himself him-self to combine with him t BothwellJaud stated Uiat if they would do F tnt he Bothwell would not Uien r forTlie other directors ecjbr Jarvls and Couk lin These directors however reruscd to accede to hla refiuest irom Uie ivhole of Jlr Richards lc ards evidence It apj ars that tat I thq real qhesUon causing all the trouble Is whelher the business of the company b Il be conducted under the direction of the board of directors who are the parties re P ° nsibl1 or It ur whether r lioUiwell shall manage IU affairs to IIU 1 alal Jils own liking Judge Powers tried very hard lu t break the force ot Mr Richards evidence on croesexamlnaUon but utterly failed I to do so |