OCR Text |
Show MCE THE POUR Divorces Granted Divorces Filed - Margene Wllberger vi Larry Wllberger 12149 - Linda Jean Lanier vi Jerry Kenneth Lanier -- ' Juanita H. Pack Marvin R. Pack Michael vi W. - Haney Lynn Hunt vi Rsymoud Leo Hunt, Christian Jensen 12156 - Marian Ontiveros vs Andrew Ontiveros - , 12157.- 7464 - Carolyn Marshall vs v Jr. Frank D. Marshall, 12025 - Joseph P. Espinoza vs Judy Ann Espinoza J. Michael L. Fry, Dr. Sandy, son Brent Riley So. 11513 - Hell Deloria Strlckllng Hicponski Sue Bowen vs Dale Bowen Larry 4073 W. 4300 So. daughter Mr. and Mrs. George Richard Wilson, 1963 So. 200 West,. Bo- Mr. and Mrs. Paul Roger 12161 - Jo Ann Craig Wesley Tame Mr. and Mrs. John E. Richards 4147 W. 3280 So. son 7733 BUTTERFIELD (nnul) - 12178 - Jacqueline W. - Meyer vs - Cora S. Clegg vs Clegg - Tania Lee Taylor vs Dennis Clinton Taylor 12182 12183 - Mary L. Rendon vs Ronald B. Rendon Vickie - Bruce L. Hunter vs Ann Hunter 12186 - Lynda Snow Hawkins vs R. Curtis Hawkins 12187 - Joan W. Lynn Rowe 12188 Rowe vs Robert - Gloria Marie Black vs 12189 - Kathleen Diane Anthony vs Robert Elwynn Anthony 12190 - Mllltza Jane Walker vs Michael Don Walker 12191 - Donna L. Blackner vs Whipple H. Blackner 12192 -- Kay Louise MatVln. Leroy Mills - Jacqueline Mills vs G. Leathern vs Michael G. Leatham - Willard Eal Shlngleton vs Sheila M. Shlngleton 12194 Jr. 12195 - Gwen J. Hlpvell vs John Earl Hlpwell 12196 - Claudette R. Young vs Divorces Granted - Susan Winner vs John Winner 10655 - Terry Morrill vs Kenneth Lee Morrill 2826 - Betty Sue P. Nicholson vs David Ralph Nicholson - Ardeil L. Ashton 1)23 University Village, daughter Mr. and Mrs. McCurdy FILED October 4, 1973 L. M. Cummings, Clerk Defendant appeals from an order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis. Defendant was convicted of the crime of first-degrmurder; his conviction was affirmed by this court in State v. Gee. Subsequently, defendant petitioned for a writ of coram nobis, whereupon a hearing was held, and the petition denied. At the hearing, evidence was adduced which indicated that during the course of the trial, while one of the jurors was in the women's restroom, an unidentified woman displayed a photograph, purporting to show the decedent in his coffin. The picture was not specifically shown to the juror but was displayed generally to all those present in the room. Upon realizing what was occurring, the juror immediately left the room. She testified that the incident in no way affected her deliberation as a juror and that she based her conclusion of defendants guilt upon the evidence introduced at vs Clyde Marriage Licenses ouls Sorenson 2360 Bryan Ave (39) to Nancy Nyberg 1505 Browning Ave (30) Myron L Robin Lynn Gardner 111 Sunset (29) to Jacquelyn LaRae Blewett 958 Washington (20) trial. t " a-wr- it Robert Louis Arnold 115 H St (28) to Susan Karrick Riser 2037 Pheasant Circ (21) James Lee Marvidlkls 593 W. 400 No. (35) to Terryll Booth nnon 231 No. 8th West (28) On appeal, defendant contends that the foregoing facts constituted a sufficient ground upon which to issue' of coramnobis. Ca- The' use of the writ of coram nobis is more restricted than the writ of habeas corpus. At the time the writ was in genera use, there was no a motion for a new trial. Subsequently, these remedies or remedy by appeal came into existence by statutory enactment and supplanted much of the former scope of the writ. 3 The legislature has provided a remedy by a motion for a new trial for the irregularities, occurring during the course of the U. C. A. 1953, trial, of which defendant complains, lie,, Section evidence of out Thus the common-lacourt or misconduct. (3) any receiving jury and defendant has been excluded supplanted by statute. remedy sought by The functions of the writ of coram nobis are strictly limited to an error of fact for which the legislature has provided no remedy, for it is only when the defendant is wholly without remedy that the common law provides one. Defendant is precluded from resorting to the Common law, since the legislature has provided a remedy, a motion for a new trial. Ernest Glen Burgess 867 W. 1st North, Provo (23) to Connie Cazler 339 E.17th So. (24) Dwight LaMar Holt, 1420 Yale Ave (20) to Helen M. Whooley 175 Canyon Rd (21) Joe Barney Berry, Honolulu (33) to Cynthia Hadfleld 719 Emerson Ave (27) w There is an additional reason that the writ may not issue: it would not have been available at common law, for coram nobis was to correct an error of fact.- It neither issues to correct an error of law nor to redress an irregularity occurring at the trial, such as misconduct of the 'jury, court, or oflicer of the court, except under circumstances amounting to extrinsic fraud, which in effect deprived the petitioner of a trial on the merits . The writ will be issued only where it clearly appears that the petitioner had a valid defense in the facts of the case, which, without negligence on his part, was not made because of duress, fraud, or excusable mistake, or he was prevented from asserting or enjoying some legal right through duress or 1. 28 Utah 2d 96, 498 P.2d 662 (1972). 2. Sullivan v. Turner, 22 Utah 2d 85, 448 P.2d 907 (1968). 3. People v. Reid. 195 Cal. 249, 232 Pac. 457, 36 A.L.R. 1435 (1924). 4. People v. Reid, note 3, supra. 5. People v. Reid, note 3, supra; 136 A. L.R. 1443, Anno: Coramnobis for matters relating to jury. fraud or excusable neglect; and these facts, not appearing on the face of the record, if timely known, would have prevented the rendition and entry of judgment. Kevin Ronald Barker 5625 So. 2700 .West, Roy (22) to Karen Colleen Griggs 474 Howard Dr. Sandy (20) Roy Gar lan (28) Phillips to Debra Kay 300 East (19) 84 R Hill, St. 34 So Class Trenton Young, 1336 E. Galaxle Dr. (23) to Jacqueline Delbrouwlre, Provo (21) David Frank Anderson 2748 E. 2880 So. (22) to Wendy Rae Simper 2748 E. 2880 So. (20) William Samuel Griffiths 1118 Herbert Ave (21) to Laurie Alice Gouldlng 150 So.7th E.(20) Robert Alan French 3995 So. 1555 .West (19) to Charlene Pearl Vance 3912 Elaine Dr. Hunter Rebecca S, Barron Since defendant has cited no authority to the contrary, we must conclude that the writ of coram nobis is not available to correct the type of irregularity during the course of the trial of which defendant complains. The order of the trial court is affirmed. Bruce L. Jones, 1650 W.9000 So. West Jordan (24) to Karen Lou Ann Krogh 6932 So. Rhonda Ave West Jordan (23) WE CONCUR: Lynn Alan Southvorth 235 Green- 10866' - Kenna Lee Maalovski vs David E. M&slcwskl U.986 - Berta (18) Robert 'Raid Young 11408 HOSPITAL - Paul D. Black 12193 COTTONWOOD 77-8-3(- 2), 12184 - Barbara Lee Gann vs Paul .Gregory G800 12185 State, Cppperton,son Mr. and Mrs. Roger Aylworth 852 7th East, son Dr. and Mrs, Joseph Lukins 4251 3080 East, son CALLISTER, Chief Justice; So. Burton Marvin Plateau Dr. (37) to Margaret Me Garry 2370 E.4800 So. (26) Michael Allen Baker W, - Linda Cohn 3047 Diane M. Baker vs 12181 W. No. 13292 Thomas Devon Gee, Defendant and Appellant. 11127 - Walter E. Pierce, Sr. vs Margie L. Pierce Sue Kenda David Mr. and Mrs. Pedro Oelaya,95 ee Roger Meyer 12180 - Russell Scott Whear vs McCurdy vs Frank David Kenda - Camille Mr. and Mrs. John Ray Hatcher 2l8l S. Lake St. No. 1, son Mr. and Mrs. Darrell R.Pett 9952 Tonya Dr, son Mr. and Mrs. Noel Lee Richardson, 4864 Coquille Ave, son v. 10872 - Marian Ruth Strong vs Gerald Eugene Strong 4838 Leland Warren Wensel vs Dorothy Janetta Wensel 12179 uiot Bernstein Mr. and Mrs. 2306 Dalin, daughter Mr. and Mrs. Perron L. Thomas Plaintiff and Respondent, G. Brlmhall vs E. Brlmhall Bradley 12164 - Belarmlno Martinez vs Karen Martinez 12177 UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL The State of Utah, Cheryl L. Smith Whear 11502 12163 - Marie Montoya vs Joe Montoya 46l6 Creekviev 'Cl, sqn In The Supreme Court Of The State Of Utah -- 12162 - Frances Lucero vs Jimmie Lucero ie, daughter - Alice Taylor vs John William Taylor Tame vs daughter Mr. and Mrs. Raymond Brazier 383 M St. son Mr. and Mrs. John Wilson, 645 Garfield Ave, daughter Kamas,son Me-Qn- 4l Herbert Ave, son Mr. and Mrs. Robert L. Berry 6677 W. 3860 So, Hunter, 7611- 12160 - Lesley Fossell Grymes vs Donald Robert Grymes Mr. and Mrs, Randy lewis, 565 E. 2nd St. Kaysville, daughter Robert V.Badham - - 12159 SOUTH DAVIS COMMUNITY Mr. and Mrs. Elvood Norris 1520 Canterbury Dr. son Mr. and Mrs1. Gene T. Bowers U.98 Princeton Ave, son Mr. and Mrs. George Montoya 333 W. No . Temple , daughter Mr. and Mrs. Mike Pappadakis vs Dennis Trrlckllng - Cora M. Medina vs A. Medina Mr. and Mrs. 8754 Chariot Mr. and Mrs. 2544 E. 3300 Mr. and Mrs. untiful, daughter Henry EDDIE Juan Bell 11896 - Jacqueline Ewing Swenser by her Gdn Doris E. Rada vs Roger Dean Thomas ' Vs. Renee E. Thomas 12158 Mr. and Mrs. Dnniel A. Render 585 W 11 St. son Claudia P. Eddie 12129 vs Joseph Thurland Edde 12039 - Marlel K. Hicponski vs III - Maureen Jenien vs 12155 LeRoy W. daughter Bell vs D. LD3 HOSPITAL Mr. and Mrs, Gordon O.Lefevre 8457 W. 3450 So. Magna, vs Albert Frank Brunicholz Wllklna v ' Josephine H. Wilkins 12154 vs Duane Winn - Deborah Brunlsholz IO961 - Betty Lou Wllferd v Ervlng Charlei Wllferd 12153 - lyn 11158 12152 - Robert . II827 - Albert TUESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1973 Births Barbara Ann Winn 12150 12151 ' DAILY RECORD wood Circle (19) to Linda Feragen 233 Murray (19) II897 - Dorothy Annette Peterson vs David L. Peterson ( annul) Sue F. Henri Henriod, Justice Creek Dr. Orlando Jerez 20 Villa Capri Court Midvale (19) to Esmeralda De La Cruz, 27 Cooper St. Midvale (20) A. H. Ellett, Justice R. L. Tuckett, Justice Births vs William R. Barron W. 8T. MARK'S HOSPITAL Mr. and Mrs. Burton Hoehne 186 W. Oakridge Dr. Farmington daughter Crockett, Justice, concurs in the result. 6. 165 Kelley v. People, 120 Colo. 1, 206 P. 2d 337 (1949); People v. Jackson, C. A. 2d 183, 331 P. 2d 981 (1958). M S |