OCR Text |
Show TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2. 1971 TMt DAILY PAGC IICOIO Third District Court Did Results Rid : Commissi an Criminal Coses toq.No. Sand Hiklcv tr J 0 ravel j In) tfm4 . :lo - 1971 Tuesday, February - Qiarles Archuleta rV7t ar laV" 7' n ? T Mm I W. sot bid R. Ellett j'B - Lynn itub'.'u Ooriis'ilcii Duivltu-- :?n.l Eovn y Davi Rape UtMn Z.iS l Unlawfully selling a narcotic Hiuifil'l - ;067 - Will ileoryopoloa -1 MrfC J- t. n VJLJ tUCUA-U-i. J . 20. Hill 609 . . i Hml 1 1 Curtis and Smis K. Heceivii Rtq. No. fc- -4 Hwi - i . f. Pitt Morton t Signal Federal Sljn 10,8.7.50 2I6.S5 Co J2.W 'l.'i-'.- f February Victor It-rr- Ttylur - "' M. Taylor :o- - Jan.Co J.i'j. j'.j: Mdw j I Scott IfccMiwrv Gcnrl r.b JS.? .? Lcjal VJ).1".t1r:i y.''i- tfiprent Co C lj'.'lar;.' .1. ."t.liiUJ'.u.t : I3H.-I'- .' - Kj!itl.( ..iJliiui.'! see Mrf U, '.:'iL J'-il.- David UPO.CO i'" allure to provide PC!.rl Ji.tui ii. crclit carl v. - M'.'l 'uJi 1 ur': ry m. O';: - luL Aboi'natlo1 Kfl. ll .'j'Jj j lulcnt uJ? Jl r. !?! bui't ialailViiis: Accaants L. L. SwiPfliays - ulen Kcbert otuckey - Iv.rrec -j- Larceny I'fl'friiilera . 1 'i''-Cl- - Lv'lveiitei' iJcull rvi'tn-icr- :!;l.i., Jr. u,i:i ) Uuin'iiiii.'.-liobbei- Lv 'ul I lyil 'j. - bfltt'ii ;i Wioile li-t- Co Crntury -- - rri-lay- , ..v.t'ti.. ly !'. 033.00 y:i;. foylor (Hurray Git;.') l. - Di.bcrui; .nn ilru--' Thursday, ie'.Try ..'..'O - 'Jeral'l leai: ce bid Service MazJ-ic- Creatim: a public tiilsaiic n: litaitb liiizarl "SrairJ rUi Irnplcintnt frw Coon ". kn l 4..HmL I rl. - C. '."ft Jemilr..'-Unlwful- :;e.lii!r l''; I'--c. lt l;i-- I.V'.VO L'avin urlv . Boyd rrunhliu narcotic Rtq. No.' W.h. :' ljf'l j,Holm Jo.'itJ air I Liii'lu r i- -. V'rlullu!' st-llir- I6.22S.D0 Mil IVvl:u:. Bautardy Darber ::..:'( - Danny C'luiT a L'nlowl'ully Jru.: l.:d.luuliHKji!iil: . , MctiraLIt t lclj' - .'' .' ry lOio-l- Vieilrie3iJayt 10,125 St l Hi-y- ; n c;3 Dunk-Robbe- Huiiijtiri!; un orri'iur ii tliu (liclirir!e oi" blsj iuty Parker DrivlJi!; uirlcr tli" in- rlui.-iiiul' jiiLo.'.i'i'c-ti- stolen proirty - i'hariaa Iuane t:jl ." p i llftnsen ! - Antliony Mi.rclli Hunter John Rusaell Public Safety FIVE lj!l-Wl- t.li-fdc- ! Jl.il !i:i.;.ii ' . ' ' J l ' - Jutlll ci" a 1.. OlU'W Vi. latii.i: 'Jll!l?lrlfc over .l'AVU J. l..:-l- - F'..o.cll iiiC-J- C A inieral "-r- vlre .'Itenut l'n.Cn fo yJO.22 - rfbw fiu In The Supreme Court Of The Stale Of Utah Gordon Berlant, Plaintiff and Appellant, i 1 nr 1 tee see bki AltcritoM 1.tr30 I Miff It j No. 12076 D.iO John S. McAllister, as Administrator of the Estates of Grant Kimball Mower and Altha Mower, ' his wife, both deceased. Defendant and Respondent. j iwln tor ervlcc M i 1 .... j j ' PfWwiHi 3 toad L.. i It emission Survey StVtt No. MM-36- 25 , : 1 , r 22.79 c turner Bio. Supply M .1 1 I3G3.O0 I Instructional 5S0.00, Workshop vfoir .0SI7 County Sheltered 10,30.00 Workshop 1 -- Tax ftvq.No. Consist I on 5-1- Olivetti touron A I i-- Wr. 27.SO.OO Line Thereafter the plaintiff, Gordon Berlant, filed an action pro e against the defendant as administrator of the estates of the Mowers for damages which he sustained as a result of the collision. The defendant counterclaimed in an T" h Coretru frldcn-M- v. i.'arrj 2330.00 llirchant kTO.OO of Slnjer :o.ca Sto.U Laboratories 2.'. 30. 00 ecu I. Id L1J. Trust Deeds Ifl0 DLttoi $12500. t; 365 T 382 unto 8006 So 3685 H, DlttoI3000. M, Ditto, H2500, 3715 8036 So Jordan - 385 996? So 3685 383 W 8030 So, H Jor W Jordan dan 386 mttoi Jordan 3WU W Jordan $12500. 7778 So 3725 W, WttolW. &782 So 3960 387 W . honin t contract to 38 B030 So, amount greatly in excess of the insurance coverage which plaintiff had. The attorneys for the insurance carrier undertook the defense of the counterclaim and pleaded the release as an affirmative defense. The defendant then moved for summary judgment, and the trial court, being of the opinion that the release was an admission of fault on the part of plaintiff, granted the motion. j Since there is no dispute in the facts of this casn, a summary judgment would be properly granted if as a matter of law the defendant was entitled In 1 The question which we have is to determine whether by taking u prevail. release of all claims against plaintiff, without prejudice lo him, necessarily defeats his right to prove his claim against the administrator of llu cst ito o' the deceased driver of the other car. i M is further understood and agreed that by the payment of said sum of money Gordon Berland does so by way of withcompromise of the claims and demands aforesaid and out prejudice or admitting any liability therefor by himself and his successors. It no nb vrroti?tis Corp Jrilt-- The undersigned hereby declares that the terms of this settlement are fully understood and voluntarily accepted for the purpose of making a full and final compromise, adjustment and settlement of any and all claims, disputed or otherwise, on account of the deaths, injuries and damages above mentioned. Mb Corp . triircytrs Inc. Typ This is an appeal from an order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. The facts are not is dispute and are as follows: 33 D5 ttwnS L. M. Cummings, Clerk - - , 1971 There was a head-o- n collision between a car driven by Grant Kimball Mower and one driven by plaintiff. Mower and his passenger wife were killed, and plaintiff was injured. Plaintiff's insurance carrier, without his knowledge or consent, made a settlement with the defendant and paid him $5, ISO for a full release of all claims against plaintiff by reason of the accident in question. The last two paragraphs of the release read: 6000.00 .03 FILED January 27, ELLETT, Justice; - Ciche I 938 So g'. Jordan h the insurance carrier if nllinr-which of the limits Ihe pl.iinliff my policy) its pay all sums (up lo be, or shall become, liable to pay. This means that the carrier r snoot to pay money until a judgment has been rendered against Ihe insured .1 lilt plaintiff. However, this does not prevent the carrier from makin:'I In- - silkili-hood is rendered. of all claims against its insured before a judgment of and the possibility settling of losing the suit, the cost of defending it, for a sum less than the foreseeable costs and expenses are all matt-- rf wh:th -- till t nti at know that nii in determining whether to settle a case or to clef fin1 n contract insurance The it. provides that the insurer will, .il 11 s own r oIt dmnot Insured. the claims settle or defend any investigate, against a carrier will consider - |