OCR Text |
Show THE DAILY RECORD Suits District Court 205390 - Lewis Judgments 'District Court J, Rushton vs Pltf$1,045. - Fred W. Royer dba Capital Collect Bur. vs 204749 JACK L. STEWART; $200.00; euta damages vs LEAH vs V. TWITCHELL PI TWITCHELL; tf$ - Ludy Irish and 205393 DLOUHY ; RONALD support of- BATES ; Utah vs - , 205396 University of Utah Hospital vs FRANK AND ARLENE AND .SON, 6997 - Any Rae Eagar vs James LeRoy Eagar - University of Utah Hospital vs JAY D. EDMONDS 205397 Pltf EDMONDS; $1,291.07; bal due 205398 - Charles 6998 - Marie David Bailey Arnett W. vs CHARLES, INC; Pltf$7250.00 $10,000; $2,500.00; agreement 205399 - Blodgett Key Punching vs I INFO CORPORATION; $2,107.16 bal due Pltf -- Pltf$1, bal due 949.44 7003 INSURANCE EXCHANGE D. M. CO. Ptf Pltf bal on acct . Pltf$5,889.91; District Court Pltf$3, against ROBERT AND 195.00; $862.65; $26. 2( Bob Joos; 51 by his gdn Robert J. Johnson and Robert J. Johnson vs LATTER DAY SAINTS HOSPITAL; Pltf - Peter Lawrence Assoc vs STEVEN C. CHAMPNEYS; Pit $155.00; $55.00; $24.30; 51 DISTR. CO; 52 $24.90; 204691 Wow, Inc. CORPN AND - Interlake Thrift C Russell G. In Holley PARTNEK et al Pltf$74, 636.64; 51 . 195479 - American Heritage Agencies, Inc. vs DEAN WIGNALL MERRILL BECKS TROM, WAYNE BECKS TROM, JOE R. WJLCOCK, ORIN FINLINSON AND BLAIR BECKS TROM; $ 1,436. 22 ; 51 G. Hughes vs - The o line Phillis Larsen vs Ernest Alan Larsen, Jr. 6133 t 5936 - Chrys M. Collier vs William Kent Collier W. Brent William Zltting, 3737 McCall St. (23) to Colleen Hansen 4906 So. 4095 W. (18) foreclosure; 51 FEDERAL-AMERIC- 5937 - Irene 7th No. Roy Nipper, Elizabeth to Mlgbaclo Fay '16) 1122 W. 8th So. (16) Pltf$4,071.50 RICHARD FLORES AND CAMILLE FLORES; Judg vs 7013 - Betty P. Watrous vs Gary E. Watrous 1140 vs 195757 - C. Duncan Marriage Licenses 205021 - Meredith DEVELOPMENT - Janice - Alexandra Mitchell v Winston A. Mitchell 51 vs 7012 3170 $325,623.79; Judg on verdict 203976 7011 - Ruth Fresquez vs Ernest R. Fresquez Harold B. Hughes Calvin S. Johnson 179368 7010 - Sheila L. Nemelka vs John A. Nemelka 6752 - Marilyn Duffln vs Gardner Duffln COOPER; Pltf 204171 - Jess's Upholstery and Mfg. Co. vs JAMES C. COR- Pat Alan Cook, 5359 North vest Ave Kearns (19) to Made-ly- n Jolle PeterBon 4230 Cheg wldden Ln. (18) Michael Jay Loester 1120 Dupont Ave (20) to Susan Kathleen Clark, 1240 Valen- tine (18) Belarmlno Martinez, 843 Logan Ave '19) to Karen M. Martinez, 38 So. 3rd E. (20) BETT DBA RESEARCH & DEVELOP- Frank Edward Bentley, Jr. Pltf$1,334. $375.29; $35.88; $67.90; 51 Cynthia Panos, 869 MENT MFG. DEPT; when the guilty plea was entered The record may show that the defendant, Victorio Guglielmetti, is present, and that the case is Kjeld set for trial this morning: Number 22607, that he is represented by his attorney Sumner J. Hatch; that the State is by Richard Shepherd; that there is also another case pending, Case Number 22608 on another charge of unlawfully selling a narcotic drug. And the record may also show that we have a jury and are ready for trial on the 22607. THE COURT: Do you 7009 - Elizabeth Atkinson vs Dennis R. Atkinson Divorces Granted 178902 - Consumer Buying Service dba Blazer Corpn vs transcript of the proceedings rep-resent- vs Don Alonza Ouncan dishonored check J00S The is as follows: - Susan -- HANSEN; 205406 - The Continental Bank and Trust Co. vs CALVIN J. BOB gently entered. - Elna J. Bennett vs Wilford G. Bennett Pltf$5,889.91; dishonored check Judgments A. Beeman M. Beeman He was represented by one of the foremost attorneys in the practice of criminal law in this state, and when a defendant enters a plea of guilty upon the advice of a competent attorney, the plea is deemed to be intelli- 7008 205405 - The Continental Bank and Tr. Co. vs MILTON E. HAN- JOHNSON; b 7007 - Brenda J. Rqsraussen vs James D. Rasmussen DON BRADSHAW SEN AND DIANA L. The fact that he was not placed on probation may have been a disappointment to him, but it affords no basis for a claim of lack of understanding of the consequences of the plea which he made. ' 205404 - Burningham Truck $963 . 15 ; In the case of State v. Barlow, 25 Utah 2d 375, 483 P. 2d 236 (1971), this court held that prison was not mandatory and a defendant could always be considered for probation. The trial judge did consider the plaintiff herein (defendant at plea time) for probation and received a presentence report. That report is not before us, but the court knew the defendant was charged with two offenses of selling a narcotic drug, to wit, marijuana, and that one case was dismissed upon a plea of guilty being received on the other. 7006 - Myrtle Lab rum Luckert vs Alton L. Luckert $2,500.00 $725.02; $1,121.80 rent and unpaid taxes Plaza, Inc. vs - Kathleen ELLETT, Justice: K. Gardner vs Kenneth L. Gardner DAVID M. HOGAN DBA HOGAN AND - 7004 - Deon E. Sherwood vs Marlowe J. Sherwood 7005 300.00; loss 205403 - Ryder Truck Rental Inc. vs i vs Roger 205402 - Ben Knowlton and Employment Security Emp.Cr.Un. Pltf$8, Camp Camp Ray Archie Sandoval Lenore Angela Sandoval 7002 $1,597.51; contract FARMERS 7000 - Glenn Thomas vs Faye Taysom Hall L. M. Cummings, Clerk The defendant (appellant herein) and his counsel entered into this arrangement with the district attorney and secured the dismissal of the case wherein it was claimed that some $3000 worth of marijuana had been sold by the defendant. By pleading to the charge which involved a sale for a lesser amount, the defendant could have hoped for a better chance at probation than would have been the case had he been convicted of the two charges. 6999 - Ruth S. Butterworth vs Marvin G. Butterworth Owen 205401 - Gordon Wilson Chev. Inc. vs JAMES R. DAVIES; Plf vs Bailey vs 7001 - Daniel Henderson Owen vs Mary Kathryn St. John 205400 - Draper Bank & Tr. Co. vs PAUL NAGELI AND DE ANNA NAGELI; M. John W. Turner, Warden, Utah State Prison, Defendant and Respondent. This is an appeal from a dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The appellant makes seven assignments of error, six of which relate to a claim that at the time of entering a plea of guilty he did not voluntarily and understandingly do so. The seventh assignment indicates that perhaps the judge thought that the statute compelled incarceration. Divorces Filed MICHAEL Pltf$1,201.93; bal due AND KATHY 427 199066 - Frank H. Fullmer vs PARLEY J. BAKER; Pltf $5,000; 52 t -- . 427 205395 - Nora Dias and State of Utah vs GERALD DIAZ; supp, FILED April 19, 1972 196738 - Vickie Lynne Cowley vs CLIFF SYKES; Pltf$586.10 RICHARD D. support GERTIN0 52 No. 12600 v. Pltf Nell E. Olson, foreman; - Velma F. Bates and 205394 State vs Kjeld Victorio Guglielmetti, Plaintiff and Appellant, 202940 - Utah State Road Comm vs LUD J. STARIKA AND LENORA J. STARIKA; Defts $47,000.00 judg In favor of defts; Judg on verdict, 1,110. $330.38; mastercharge acct State of Utah 427 RICHARD HOLLADAY; $20,156.67; AND In The Supreme Court Of The State Of Utah Pltf$394.69 183701 - Larson Ford Sales Inc. and Walter Park Larson - Bank of Salt Lake RONALD CORDOVA; $148.23; $24.60; 205391 - Paul Nichols vs JACK L. STUART; Pltf$1,556. $300.00; auto damages 205392 T. RAY PAGE THREE 1531 No. 250 West E. '29) to Southlake Dr. Murray (27) have some other disposition that you wish to make? like to make a record before we do. U. C. A. 1953 (Replacement Vol. 6, 1971 Pocket MR. HATCH: 1. ed Sec. I would Supplement). 2. Me Mann v. Richardson, 397 U. S. 759, 90 S. Ct. 1441, 25 L. Ed. 2d 763 (1970). I understand, Mr. Guglielmetti, that both of these charges, that you are charged with sale of a narcotic drug, to wit: cannabis sativa, marijuana. One being charged on May 4th, and one being charged on May the 26th; both being charges of sale to one Ronald Baker. Do you understand that? MR. GUGLIELMETTI: MR. HATCH: Do Yes. you understand, though, that the charges you are charged with under our present law are felonies? MR. GUGLIELMETTI: Right. MR. HATCH: And conviction, or plea of guilty to either, or to both could result in your incarceration in the State Prison? MR. GUGLIELMETTI: Right. MR. HATCH: And you also understand that the court has some discretion in this xhatter in a probationary basis as to probation and condition? Now, as has been indicated, the State, on a plea of guilty to one of the charges, would be willing to move the Court to dismiss the other charge, which is discretionary of the Court. Do you understand that? MR. GUGLIELMETTI: Yes. You and I have talked the matter over thoroughly together on the matter of the type of disposition, MR. HATCH: is that correct? MR. GUQUELMETTI: Yes. MR. HATCH: And is it your desire to change your plea with regard to the sale that is alleged to have been made to Ronald Baker on the 4th day of May of 1970? MR. GUGLIELMETTI: Yes, I am. MR. HATCH: Do you understand that there are no promises, and we could make no promises of what the Judge would do in the way of sentencing? It's entirely within his discretion? MR. GUGLIELMETTI: Yis. Continued on pap 4 |