OCR Text |
Show TUESDAY, MAY 2. 1972 vs Marriage Licenses District Court Judgments - State Tax 83 259 THE las gam judg 425 204690 vs - Peter' Lawrence Assoc JESS DENNIS BARNARD JO ANNE BARNARD; foreclosure; 425 foreclosure; 425 - Pioneer Dodge Center Inc. vs RITA SHUMAN vs Cottonwood Hospital; gam. 424 T. FARRELL CHENEY AND ROSE Douglas Allen Smith, 496 E. 12300 So. Draper (20) Bonnie Jean Best, 971 E. 10600 So. Sandy (20) Pltf$700.00 $19.90; $2.50; $238.60; 425 MARY CHENEY; 204356 - Ireco Emp.Cr. Union vs REED B. R0H0LT; Pltf$857. - Zions First Natl 204065 Bk vs HAMBLIN; Pltf $836.91; $2t5.00; $27.00 WALLACE 204710 - Security Adjustment Bur Inc. vs MARY ANNE BARNES 204792 - Freedom Planning Corpn vs WILLIAM P. HANSEN Pltf$901.67; $283.75; $30. - Inc. vs TED Waters 426 18-d- 204769 - Circle Supply Co vs DON PEWTRESS; Pltf$7,527 5209 - Arthur Gregory vs Callle 1H. Watson Gregory $30.50; $22.00; $2.50;$2.50 6023 - Sharon J. Chatelain vs John L. Chatelain Divorces Filed J. Taylor Rex The defendant's agent testified by deposition that he 'advised plaintiff's grown son who called him on the phone that if the premium was paid by August 10, 1969, the amount of the policy would be paid to the plaintiff. Notice of the date of expiration had been sent to the deceased and received by him prior to August 1, 1969. A second notice of expiration stating that the policy would be reinstated was mailed to the insureds on August 3, 1969. No premium was sent to the defendant within the period fola the check dated August 13, 1969, was lowing expiration date. However, sent in an envelope bearing a postmark date of August 16, 1969, and was received August 18, 1969, by the defendant. A policy was written effective August 18, 1969, wherein pursuant to plaintiff's instruction the plaintiff and 4553 - Deborah Ann John vs Gary Allen John 6945 - Nancy Taylor vs Kenneth - Cheryl Lynn Ahre vs Robert Duane Ahre, Jr 5831 Wirthlin vs Wirthlin 10-d- ay 6947 - Lillian Blanche vs Robert Clift Birtljs Clift LDS HOSPITAL Mr. and Mrs. Karniell G. Party 4474 Acord Cl, son Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Rice, 430 B St. daughter Mr. and Mrs. Jay B. Sutherland 3853 1030 East, daughter Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Lamar Hokes, 8167 10th East, Sandy, 6948 - William Lee Gregovich vs Sherley Lewis Gregovich 6949 - Robert S. Drain vs Julie Drain 6950 - Charles Edwin Grambow vs Betty Decker Grambow her daughter were the named insureds. The plaintiff assigns three points of 30-d- son - Connie R. Petty vs Stephen R. Petty Pieter Goudriann vs Helberdina Goudriaan 6953 - Merlyn Elaine Yates k Jar vs Edward Ashton Kjar Kemmemer,Wyo, t period is not a grace period during which the policy remains in force. It is a period during which the insured can reinstate the policy so as to relate back to the expiration date but only on condition that the premium be received within the period following the expiration ! ! I INC. The Daily Record 1397 South Main Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 i 86.45 I 84150 Sales Tax Total encl. j REND TO: Nnme Address. City , Appellant contends that the company policy to provide continuous protection if the premium was paid within 10 days from the expiration date of the policy to be renewed a constitutes "grace" period. We think this position is untenable. There is no provision for a "grace" period in. the policy. The policy of the company to provide continuous protectiondf the premium was paid within 10 days after the expiration date of the policy constituted an offer by the insurance company to the insured which required acceptance of the insured by the actual payment of the premium, or part thereof, possibly, in order to constitute a contract. There is no showing in this case whatsoever that the premium was paid or tendered to the insurance company within the 10 day period in which continuous protection could be procured. Neither is there any fraud alleged against the insurance company, nor any other fact, which in law . Gentlemen: I'm interested in your cassette tape on the school busing case. I understand I can also purchase a Nurcleo Model 1530 tape recorder (suggested list 854.95) for tlie specinl priceof$41.50. f&wTosuuiT my cliecJTTur: j be played in any cassette ay The question of coverage for ted days following the period covered by the policy has been before the courts for decision. The case of McClure v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. , 148 S. E. 2d 475 (Ga. App. 1966), was identical to the instant matter. There the policy expired July 18; the insured was killed July 26; and the premium for renewal was paid August 2. In affirming summary judgment for the defendant, the appellate court said: Into Learning Time! player. Just slip it in and push a button. Play it in the morning while you are getting up, or in your car while commuting to work, in your office, while traveling, or at any time when you are not mentally ay date of the policy. cnsetle tapes can 10-d- 10-d- Norelco tape recorder It (2), vehicle, or aircraft, when such insurance is issued as part of insurance on the vehicle, or aircraft, shall be deemed to be vehicle insurance. The JURISTICS, schedule. -6 Insurance against accidental death or accidental injury 5 ORDER TODAY AND SAVE th 31-11- The next claim of Does this case mean cross-tow- n busing of school children in Salt Lake City? Could the Courts order your child in an East Bench or Avenues School to be bused to an inner city school? Now, JUR1STICS Tapes bring you the landmark school busing decision. Listen to the ruling and find out how it applies to Salt Lake City residents. Hear the introduction, opinion and conclusion on the most important and controversial decision ever regarding school desegregation. JURISTICS has already gone to all the work to save you the time it would take to make an study of this This case. tape is important vitally extremely convenient and easy to use, especially for the man with a busy ay to persons while in, entering, alighting from, adjusting, repairing, cranking, or caused by being struck by a H Time first assignment is error iB based upon a contention that any loss within ten days after the expiration of the policy is covered by the occurring policy whether or not the premium is paid. On April 20, 1071, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of compulsory school busing in the Sicann vi. Charlottc-- ccklcuburg Board of Education ease. A. O tr.r'- - 4. Turn Wasted The The answer to this claim is to be found in Section U. C. A. 1953 (Replacement Vol. 4), which reads: son - error. that the coverage in the automobile policy was "life insurance" and under the statute must contain a grace period. Mr. and Mrs. James R. Carter" 1072 Chicago St. daughter Mr. and Mrs. Antony J. Slippo 233 E. Helm Ave, daughter Mr. and Mrs. Allen R. Larsen, Jr. 2160 Applewood Ave", son Mr, and Mrs. Arthur G. Johnson 6951 6952 - ay On August 2, 1969, plaintiff's husband lost his life while occupying an automobile. The policy had by its terms terminated and would only be effective provided the premium was paid to the defendant on or before August 10, 1969. 'annul) 426 6946 - Lynn The original policy terminated February 1, 1969, and was reinstated on February 18, 1969, pursuant to the offer of the defendant. The premium was paid for the period February 18 to August 1, 1969, no charge being made for the period when the policy was not in force. Pltf$1,579. INDUSTRIES; $24.90; The policy of insurance was for a period of six months with a provision for renewal of an additional six months if a premium was paid in advance on or before the expiration date of the policy. There was no grace period provided for in the policy. However, the defendant company had a standing offer to its policyholders that if the premium was paid within ten days after the policy had expired, it would renew the policy effective so as to afford continuous coverage. The company also had a standing offer to its policyholders that in case the policy terminated and was not renewed by paying the premium within ten days following the expiration date of the policy, it would renew the policy effective on the date of receipt of the advance premium, provided the same was received within 40 days after the expiration date of the policy and that the premium would be adjusted so that no charge would be made for the time when no coverage was afforded. The expiration dates for the policy in question were February 1 and August 1. Creek Road, Sandy (22) to Leslie Ann Morrison, 55 E.610C South Murray '22) & Rogers CONTINENTAL ASSOCIA- Van to Albert Peterson, 2210 Chad 424 204930 The plaintiff and her husband were the named insureds in an automobile insurance policy which contained a provision that if a named insured should be killed while occupying an automobile, the defendant would pay to the beneficiary the sum of $10, 000. Plaintiff's husband lost his life while occupying an automobile, and this action was commenced to recover on the policy. Summary judgment was granted to the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals. Donald James Carter, 6450 So 1040 W. Murray (22) to Mary Ann Thompson, 3478 So. 335 E. (19) Pltf$1,396.60; $701.56 $39.00; 425 L. M. Cummings, CleTk ELLETT, Justice: (22) SCHWA-REBE- ANNE Defendant and Respondent. Steven Clarence Faurschou 1175 So. 8th East f23) to Dianne Auger, 827 Sonata St 425 AKA MARY corporation, Glenn Edward Hardy, 3909 So. 4800 West, Granger (23) to Jana Gay Clayson, 3888 So 2520 West, Granger (22) $289.33; 425 April 17, 1972 Insurance Company, an Illinois Henry Lee Fields, Abingdon, Va. 24) to Katinka DeRyk, ''089 So. 1115 West (20) West Jordan - Terry Creen vs 204688 FILED State Farm Mutual Automobile Wallace Reed Barrow, 1784 W. Chawtoe Ave (68) to Ethel Mae Sanders, 4896 W.5015 South (43) 204269 $33.64; garn judg; No. 12598 v. W. Judg in PAXMAN; Plaintiff and Appellant, Dexter Irvin Greener, 3236 Meadow Wood Way (18) to Anna Marie Roger, 3236 Meadow Wood Way (17) Judg In 204606 - Peter Lawrence Assoc Inc. vs RUSSELL PAXMAN AND DARLENE Betty Wickes, '17) AND PAGE THREE In The Supreme Court Of The State Of Utah Randall Kenneth Rudd, 3582 So. 4240 West Granger (18) to Debbie Lynne, Harris, 4002 Acord Way Cranger J. LOFTIN vs NichoCo. garn; $167.13; & RECORD i Conm BILLY DAILY State Zip ! I . . 1. ! |