OCR Text |
Show THE PAGE TWO DAILY - LAWYERS WEDNESDAY, MARCH RECORD Suits District Court Suits City Court 38799 - Utah vs MRS. JOHN ALL "GREEN SHEETS" (Supreme Court Decisions) PUBLISHED WHEN ISSUED here, where one has taken possession under a purchase agreement, and enter into a contract for the construction of improvements thereon, he is deemed to be the equitable owner and is charged with the responsibilities of ownership within the meaning of the mechanic's lien statutes. In the instant matter Western was in possession of the lift under its option to purchase. It received the fees from operation and made such improvements as it and it alone decided. Barrett had nothing to do with any work contracted for. The fact that Western never made the payments required to exercise the option is of no consequence. The law is set forth in and 132, as follows: 53 Retail Credit Bur. Pltf$25.00 Am. Jur. 2d, Mechanics' Liens, Sees. 131 38800 J. WRIGHT; note of vs AND CAROL Pltf$851.52; $250.00 - Peoples Finance SLC vs ADEANA M. 38802 - Peoples Finance Thrift Co. of SLC JONES, JANE JONES Pltf R. KREMER; note of vs Thrift & STOSICH RAY Utah vs AND DOROTHY & M. STEED; STEED MARCIA Pltf$140.07; $60.00 - Floor Coverings by MONTOYA $6.10; 315 30796 - JOE L. Home Pltf$298.00 GUITERREZ; - Drs. Evans, Evans Evans, Inc. vs & ROBERT MAYNES 37900 - National Chemsearch Corpn vs TOWN & COUNTRY MURRAY Pltf$221.41; $12.00; 312 38459 - Western Outfitters & Guides, Inc. vs C. P. HAMILTON Pltf$51.02; $7.00; $50.00; 315 - Utah Retail Credit Bur. MRS. D. A. HARDY; Pltf$20.00 Pltf$35.00 MRS. D. A. HARDY; 38164 37755 vs Pltf$52.22 Retail Credit Bur Pltf$25.00 ANN HARDMAN; - Utah Retail Credit Bur. DARL BROOKS; Pltf$70.37 $9.00; $25.00; 315 38782 vs - I'tah Retail Credit Bur. DONNA BOOTH; Pltf$40.00 check 38783 - Utah Retail Credit Bur vs JUDY check 3;!76& WHITTLE; Pltf$10.95 BOSSHARDT; Retail Credit Bur. vs ILIENE BENNETT;Pl tf ; $187.00 check 38786 - Utah Retail Credit Bur. vs LUELLA check 38787 vs - FRANK JACKSON; Fox Insurance Service STITT; COMFORT $55.44; account 38789 Pltf$218.86 - Peter Lawrence Assoc. Inc. vs vs Pltf$30.00 C0NTR".; Pltf - Peter Lawrence Assoc. Inc Pltf$302.69; acct FRED MROS; - Peter Lawrence Assoc. Inc vs HOWARD SEARS; Pltf$36.41; acct 38790 AND ILENE Pltf$550.43 $180.00 - Boyd LIGHTING Jensen vs bal DON Pltf$223.42 38794 - Goodfellows, Inc. dba Save More Market vs L. H. STRONG MOTOR check CO; Pltf$255.85 38795 - Utah Retail vs NANCY ELKINGTON; 38796 H. ANN JOHN CUMBERLEDGE, FUND AND FIREMAN'S Pltf$735.00 Credit Bur. MICHAEL WALKER AKA MICHAEL RON WALKER AKA MIKE KNIGHT Pltf$400.93; $8.40; $10000; 3.15 Pltf$40.00 38797 - Utah Retail Credit Bur. vs IVERN M. BRADLEY; Pltf$35.00 check $285.93; $112.00; $9.20; 315 38066 - Salt Lake City vs DUANE R. CLARK; 315 - Dick E. Pltf$651. 10; Coombs GARY B. JULENE SMITH, GEE AND MARVA GEE; $12.00; 129 Suits vs L. Pltf$325.00 District Court check I - Gordon 198277 L. CARTER VERA vs A. Madsen J. AND ALVIE 198278 - Tonnesen Sprinkler vs WALLACE R. WOODBURY AND DBA WOODBURY-MORR- CARTER Co ROBERT CORP IS Pltf$780.00; services - 198279 Inc. vs W. BUR AND LAW ENFORCEMENT N. INC; (10) cause - Lou Tillotson vs 198280 CIVIL Theatres Commonwealth APOLLO PRODUCTIONS, of action Pltf$10,000 JACKSON; $5,000; damages - Ted vs Lynn McHenry RICHARDSON, DONALD J. RICHARDSON, ROBERT D. EDWARDS AND I ML FREIGHT INC; PAUL J. Pltf 198282 - Robert Leroy Simmons vs WILLIAM GERALD HARWOOD AND INC; Pltf $2, 400. 00 $200,000; death claim 198283 - Leila ESTATE LIFE Heap vs AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. Pltf$942.60; bal due - American National Enterpri- 198284 ses Inc. vs NEIL WISE; Pltf $25,000; $2,000; damages - Jan Foulks vs BROOKS D. HOWARD; Pltf$250.00 per mo support 198285 District Court Judgments 194504 - Fidelity Industrial Cr. vs RONALD G. HELLIER vs Kennecott Copper Corporation, garn. $81.67 - Household Consumer Discount 196805 vs GEORGE A. WARREN; Pltf $980.80; $300.00; $23.60; 38 Company - Laura Edna Sanderson and 194412 Homer L. - Julllan 191459 $15,000; verdict 197384 12871 W. HOFFMAN; $7,015.09; $90,000; pers Injury DATACAP 197441 Burningham, Jr $ 1300. 00; 192148 -- Pltf$247.00 Judgment on R. Lehmer vs $250.00; $22.00 - Teletype Corporation vs INTERNATIONAL, $13,924.49; Pltf Hosklsson vs L. Blackner vs foreclosure 311 - Charles $17.50; 311 W. DOROTHY - Bessie SMITH, 198264 - Craig R. Lambson by his Gdn Ronald L. Lambson vs RONALD W. DAHL AND JOHN E. DAHL; Pltf 198265 - Clarence vs LARRY BRIMHALL; W. LE ROY TURNER; LARRY EDYE Sanderson vs Pltf$150.00; 311 GRAY: PAUL stock Pltf Pltf$1754.31; lien JR. 197740 and damages 38798 - Utah Retail Credit Bur. vs SANDRA BELLOWS; Pltf$18.02 Brockbank and G. Rich Sharon M. Brockbank vs THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY AND INSURANCE ASSOCIATES INC. and S. CRAIG HUNTER; $15, 000 gam judg 37618 - Axelrad Furniture Co. vs PATRICIA ABERNATHY; Pltf 36944 - 198276 36947 - Axelrad's Furniture vs Pltf$56.60 SORENSON; $20,000; pers injury Pltf$20.00 J0HANSEN; $8.40; $25.00; 315 - Utah Retail Credit Bur. vs GEORGE check - Muriel Killpack vs 198274 BARBARA - Utah Retail Credit Bur GORDEN INTERMOUNTAIN CENTER; check services 38788 CUMMINGS ADAMS ON AND - Utah Retail Credit 38785 - Utah - Peter Lawrence Assoc. Inc 38792 - Interwest Corporation dba Air West vs RODNEY L. DAHL Pltf$559.90; bal due 38793 Bureau vs VIRGINIA Pltf$15.00; check 38128 vs contract - Diners Club vs SORORITY Pltf$3,391.98; bal on acct TRUCKWAY. $9.00; $25.00; 315 Court DAN K. $2500.00; damages - Utah Retail Credit Bur 36769 - Utah vs JO Crockett, Justice vs Nancy Moulton support 198281 vs E. J. CHRISTENSEN; $8.00; $50.00; 315 CUMMINGS; - 198271 Pltf$14, 090.80; $6.80; $25.00; 315 F. Henri Henriod, Justice Ser Frank vs MARSHALL Pltf$1, 250.00; $2,000; stock P. MORRIS Pltf$148.70; $6.40; 312 37494 - Utah Retail Credit Bur vs DERRALD HORROCKS; Pltf$12.00 R. L. Tuckett, Justice T; R0SE-QUIS- E. insurance coverage Acceptance Corpn vs $8.40; 312 37768 DBA CONTEMPORARY Pltf$145.97 $8.80; $25.00; 315 G. - Charles CUMBERLEDGE - Newspaper Agency Corpn BARBARA SEWING CENTER; vs GARY AKA GERRY 198273 38266 - Utah Retail Credit Bur 38791 198270 INC; Judgments City Court Chief Justice AND MRS. R0SEQUIST 198272 - South East Furniture Co. vs GERALD D. SMITH; Pltf$940.50 $317.00; contract Thrift $7.80; $25.00; 315 vs DEAN 38805 - Peoples Finance & Co. vs EDDIE L. ALSOP AND vs Pltf$6.00 - Security Adjustment Bur. INSURANCE COMPANY; WE CONCUR: tf$2, 147.98 MOULTON, 38266 - Utah Retail CreditBur. PI Pltf$244.00; $6.10 vices LEAR; $121.66; contract It seems clear to us, as it did to the trial judge, that Barrett is entitled as a matter of law to a summary judgment in its favor, and in that regard the judgment is affirmed with costs awarded to the respondent. 38781 Credit Agency Omympus Thrift Co. vs NINA C0LEY AMOITTE Pltf$303.71; $115.00; note 38806 There was no showing of fraud or collusion on the part of either Barrett or Western, nor were there any facts presented which would tend to establish the relation of principal and agent between them. As shown by the affidavits on file, it was clearly a bona fide transaction between the parties. The contract provided that Western was to pay future taxes and specifically prohibited Western from encumbering any interest or right it had under the contract without first getting the written consent thereto from Barrett. No such permission was ever requested or granted. vs DANIEL P. VICIL; check - 198268 & Certified, Inc. vs JANIEL D. MITCHELL; Pltf$315.00; $31.50 The fact that Barrett did not elect to forfeit the contract as soon as Western failed to pay as required and left Western in possession of the property does not create an agency relationship. Suits-C- ity note 198269 Pltf$611.89 38804 - Peoples Finance 32174 J. Allan JAMES; Inc. vs Thrift BEVERLY SHANNON $210.00; note vs Jr., Pltf$1, 325.05; $375.00 RONALD $178.32; $75.00 G. AND PAULINE JAMES vs JOANNE CALHOUN; $520.93; bal due & GAYLEN AND - Peoples Finance note E. R. Callister, 198267 - N. A. A. C. P. Credit Un. vs MYRNA L. JAMES HOBS ON JERRY ROSEQUIST ALSOP; lessee is not generally considered the agent of the lessor within the contemplation of the mechanic's lien statutes merely by virtue of the relation of landlord and tenant. Nor is an agency relationship created merely by the consent of the lessor to the making of alterations and improvements upon the leased premises. Knowledge of, and acquiescence in, the making of improvements by the tenant, are insufficient to establish agency. . . . note Pltf$285.94; $110.00; agreement 38803 A Co. AND SAMUEL 38801 Co. Co. A tenant or lessee cannot subject the interest of his landlord to a mechanic's lien by reason of the tenant's contract for materials or labor, even though the improvements are for the permanent improvement of the property, such as a tenant-erecte- d building, unless the landowner in some way brings about such improvements or does some act in ratification of, or consents to, or is estopped to object to, work done or the furnishing of materials or labor. . . . E. WRIGHT 830.56; $763.40;$617.73 Pltf$2, - Aetna Finance RAYMOND 198266 - Commercial Credit Plan Inc. vs RONALD D. FREDRICKSON KEMP; check 17, 1971 $24.00; INC; 312 - Transport Clearings vs SUNNY Pltf Inter-mounta- HILLS MINES, INC Pltf$567.83; $24.20; 312 in |