OCR Text |
Show THE ARGUS. Binkleys ENian A. ;i Whether from the standpoint of a for plaintiff ; Dickson, Ellis & Ellis for defendWeel, sir, Im thinkin o gettin ant. vs. Silver Bros., Iron Works creditor or that of a debtor the Mil- - J. B. Montgomery Binkley usually reads a book after married again.1 Co. George 1 Costigan, Jr. for plaintiff ; James supper, but one night he was feeling Oh, that is it ! Let me see ; that lard Progress does not explain when n. Moyle for defendant, rather talkative, and he thought he ig pretty frequent, surely. How many it says: There never was a time, LEGAL. would entertain his wife for a time husbands have you had ? perhaps, when the necessity for paying while she was sewing. Weel, sir, she replied, in a tone small bills was more imperative than 0. W. POWERS, Elvira, he said, Ive got an less of sorrow than of bitterness, at present. Attorney and Counselor, enigma for you. Try if you can this is the fourth. Im sure there Eagle Block, corner Second South and West Temple Streets, opposite Poatofflce Block. never wis a wumman sae completely guess it. 1 CO Why, certainly, dear, said Mrs. tormented wi sic a set o deein men FRANK PIERCE, to I used dote on as Ive been. Binkley. just Attobney, Spare Moments. EQUITY TRIAL CA5ES. McComiek Block. enigmas when I was a girl. Do tell Hlles for Trial the Calendar Coming Judge it to me. A titled Englishman was a guest at Week. C. W. MORSE, 1 made a All right, said Binkley. is the a cases list of The a dinner following Washington house, and Attobney at Law, it up myself. I am found in town 7 week in 8 Utah Commercial and Savings set for his trial the Rooms The honor. was and in coming Judge party given but not in books ; in street, but not in host cautioned the colored butler to Hiles division of the Third District Bank Building, No. 22 E. 1st South St. office ; in night, but not in work ; in address the N. W. SONNEDECKER, My Court: Englishman as Mon day, April 26th. dance, but not in business, and in Lord. Attorney, This he remembered to do Thomas G. Shearman vs. Moroni Edwards 307 McCornick Block. not in but racket, early. WhatamI? until he passed the Special dish of the Dickson, Ellis & Ellis and C. O. Whittemore ou are a miserable, deceiving, vile, occasion stewed Critchlow and Williams, Van Cott A Isuther- terrapin . land attorneys for defendant. abandoned villain, said Mrs. BinkThe appearance of the dish is not Brigham Young Trust Co. vs. Salt Lake Grain TYPEWRITER A Complete Co. et al. Young & Moyle and Barlow Ferguson Line of I specially inviting, so, when the PAPERS, ley, laying down her sewing. for plaintiff ; Brown A Henderson, 1. M. Wadand Stewart A Stewart for defendants. CARBONS, suspected for a long time that er handed it to him, the Englishman dell ITimOIEBY Antoinette B. Kinney vs. W. D. Brandt etal. C. S. Kinney for plaintiff ; Frank Hoffman for RIBBONS, your going downtown to post up your declined it, saying sotto voce : LOW PRICES. defendants. MSS. COVERS, books was only a pretence, but I never looks It uncommonly nawsty. Tursdat, April 27th. would W. have Co. et al. vs. Salt Lake Hanson Pembroke Itaiionery Co. F. the brutal thought you The butler was so taken aback at Grain Co. et al. Produce N. W. Soanedecker for plainassurance to come out and acknowl-edg- e the idea of ; Stewart A Stewart for defendants. any one refusing such a tiffs A Loan Society vs. J. J. Snyder et aL Savings it, you brazen profligate. S. McDowall for plaintiff : Booth, Lee A Gray, delicacy that he forgot himself and Pence E. B. CRITCHLOW, Attorney. A Allen and Frank Pierce for defendants. Atlas Block. Why, Elvira, whats the matter said : S. Hays et. al. vs. Giovanni Lavagnino Frank Hoffman for plaintiffs; S. H. Lewis for dewith you? Im just giving you a EXECUTORS SALE. But its terrapin, my God. fendant. to an ordar of the Probate Division Pursuant word. Wednesday, April 28th. of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake Pittsburg Dispatch. Julia B. Steever vs. BarloV Ferguson et al. County, in the matter of the estate of Jonathan Yes, youre always giving me your Bennett, Harkness, Howat A Bradley for plain- M. Williamson, deceased, the undersigned will word and breaking it. I can see tiff ; N. V. Jones and C. W. Boyd for defendants, offer at public sale at the front (west) door of vs. L. D. Kinney et al. (two the City and County building, Salt Lake City, The American of Ogden is S. F. Walker cases) Sutherland A Howat for plaintiff ; Utah, on the 17th day of May, 1897, at 12 oclock through your enigmas and insinuaBrown A Henderson for defendants. m., tlie following described property, situate in tions, you base monster you ! Then calling pathetically for three grains the County of Salt Lake, State of Utah, bound29th. April Thursday, of asks Editor mother. Smith and described as follows, com, J. M. Stoutt et aL vs. New American Gas A edCommencing you come and laugh at me to my face at a point 51 feet east of' the A al. W. Co. Street and Fuel et Burton J. Dey for cabbage, potatoes, parsnips, flour, of lot 1, block 39, Plat A, corner southwest about it. A deVan Pelt for for plaintiffs; Goodwin and running thence Lake Salt Survey, City anything an editor and his help can fendants. 10 rods; thence east 81V4 feet: thence Cant you understand anything? York Mining Co. vs. J. H. Shannon et al. (two north 10 rods ; thence west 31tt feet to the place In conclusion he adds : Now cases) Williams, Van Cott A Sutherland for south said Binkley. The letter 1 is in ea' of beginning. plaintiff ; H. S. McCallum for defendants. BOYD PABK. ! The terms ef sale cash. are we thu torBet iont hunPT not in but town, book, and r is Executor of the last will and testament of Saturday, May 1st. Jonathan M. Williamson, deceased. Grant C. McNeil vs. E. G. Dorr et al. Parin street, but not in office, and i Salt Lake City, Utah, April 23rd. 1897. dee A Kroeger for plaintiff ; Pence A Allen for B. Critchlow, Attorney for Execntor. E. defendants. is in night, but not in work, and Truth crushed to earth will rise so on till the word is finished. The again, quoted the earnest man. LAW CASE5 AT ISSUE whole thing is trick you know. E. D. B. THOMPSON, Attornei. Thats true, replied Senator Progress Block. of Judge Cherrys Trial Calendar Yes, I know its a trick, Samuel Sorghum, but, in many cases, not Condition PROBATE NOTICE. for Next Week. Binkley, and Ive been watching it a until after the referee has counted IN THE DISTRICT COURT, (Probate DiThe following is a list of the civil vision), Third Judicial District, in and for Salt long time. Out at night to your ten. Washington Star, Lake County, State of Utah. jury cases set for trial the coming In the dances and rackets, and m here at matter of the estate of Jane Wheatley, deceased. week in division of Notice is Notice. Judge Cherrys home slaving and sitting up till 2 A certain scribe of northern Utah hereby given that Walker T. Gun- , of the estate of Jane Wheat-leyadministrator : Third District Court the ter, oclock in the morning for you to come lays great stress on the fact that he is has rendered for settlement, deceased, Monday, April 26th. and filed in said Court, his final account of his home I I know your triek, sir ! You a Mormon. Doubtless the Church Henry Fares vs. Park City Bank et aL J. M. administration of said estate and petition for Thomas for plaintiff: Bennett, Harkness, flnl distribution of the residue of said estate h thought I wasnt smart enough to feels it keenly enough already Howat A Bradley for defendants. among the persons entitled thereto, and that on to your disgraceful enigma, out having the fact thrown up to it in D. C. McLaugun vs. Geneva A. Kimball, ad- Wednesday, the 12th day Of May, A. D. 1897, at of said ministratrix Brown A Henderson for plaintiff; 9:30 oclock a. m., at the I should tnink a man as low down and public, Bennett, Harkness, Howat A Bradley for de- Court, in the County Court House, Salt Lake fendant. City and County, Utah, has been duly appointed James Nesbitt et aL vs. Robert C. Chamb-r- s contemptible as you are would be by the Judge of said Court, for the settlement A McMillan and Richards A Richards of said account, and hearing said petition for Richards ashamed to boast to his wife of his murder and highway robbery for plaintiffs; Bennett, Harkness, Howat A distribution, at which time and place any person interested in said estate may appear and disreputable deceptions under cover near Ogden day before yesterday Bradley for defendant. show cause, if any there be, why said account Tuesday, April 27th. should not be settled and approved and final of a pusillanimous, silly, childish, et aL distribution made as prayed for. lengthens the list of crimes and John J. Hafeling vs. John J. Roberts for plalntitf' Dated April 13, 1897. WiuiaSm You let me hear you say a I casualties in Utah for the week enigma MxKay fodefendants DAVID C. DUNBAR, Clerk. jus 1 word about going downtown at E. By George, Blair, Deputy Clerk. HSmiti.Id wl night ended E. D. R. Thompson, Attorney for AdministraWilliam McKay for defendants. again, Samuel Binkley, and Ill give apl Ira M. Frye vs. E. E. Ritchie R. B. Shepard tor. for plaintiff; M. L. Ritchie for defendant. you an enigma that will take half the MOYLE, ZANE A COSTIGAN, Attorneys, Wednesday, April 28th. hair off your head. Deseret National Bank Building. J. P. Mielstrup vs. Nat M. Brigham S. W. Darke and Le Grand Young for plaintiff ; James PROBATE NOTICE. Binkley now reads a book again of H. Moyle for defendant. DISTRICT COURT, (Probate DiJ. P. Meilstrup vs. W. M. Risley S. W. Darke IN THE evenings after supper. N. Y. Jourin and for Salt Third Judicial I I I I If I UJailt 306-30- I 7 I 1 but-hav- e tiX?. - I X-Ra- ys I to-wi- t: I 1 I 1 1 I apl24-3t-1- 5 9 1 I with-catc- court-roo- m I I I 1 I nal. TORT1ENTED WITH DEEIN flEN. The following conversation is reported to have taken place between a minister and a widow, both of Aberdeen, Scotland. The widow, who called upon the minister, seemed desirous of relieving her mind of something which oppressed her, at which the reverend gentleman, wishing to hurry up mat- ters, exclaimed : My good woman, you see I can be of no service to you till you tell me what it is that troubles you. M I w CAFE Tie lest Eatlqg-fioo- se Betweeq Cblcago ail Saq Francisco. I I T 17-4t- -8 District, vision) Lake County, State of Utah. In the matter of the estate of Thomas deceased. Notice. Notice is hereby given that Mary Hepworth, the administratrix of the estate of Thomas deceased, has rendered for settlement and filed in said court, her final account of her administration of said estate and petition for final distribution of the residue of said estate to the said Mary Hepworth. heir and assignee of the other heirs. of the said Thomas Hepworth, deceased, and that Saturday, the 15th day of May, A. D. 1897, at 9:30 oclock a. m., at the court room of said court, in the County Court House, Salt Lake City and County, Utah, has been duly appointed by the Judge of said Coart, for the settlement of said account and hearing said petition for distribution, at which time Friday, April 30th. and place any person interested in said estate Maria Horrocks vs. Salt Lake ers. and show cause, if any there be, may appear Straup A Lippman for plaintiff; WiDiam Mc- why said account should not be settled and apKay for defendants. proved and final distribution made as prayed for. Jesse W. Crosby, Jr., vs. D.W. Sullivan et aL Dated April 2lBt, 1897. Barlow Ferguson for plaintiff; Powers, Stranp DAVID C. DUNBAR, Clerk. A Lippman for defendants. By Geo. E. Blair, Deputy Clerk. Stuaebaker Bros. Manufacturing Co. vs. S. H. Moyle, Zane A Costigan, Attorneys24--for AdPinkerton Williams, Van Cott A Sutherland ministratrix. a pi 4 and Le Grand Young for plaintiff ; R. B. Shepard Lewis N S,mith Robert Linn et aL- -8. P. Armstrong for plaintiff; Bennett, Harkness, Howat A Bradley for defendants. Thursday, April 29th. Melvina Beanchamp vs. Salt Lake Dramatic! Association Powers, Straup A Lippman for plaintiff ; Barlow Ferguson for defendant. Levy Grocery Co. vs. J. W. Fox et al. J. M. Bowman for plaintiff ; Barlow Ferguson for defendants. Isabella George, administratrix, vs. J. W. Fox et &L J. Mi Bowman for plaintiff; Barlow Ferguson for defendants. Thomas Venard vs. George Y. Wallace C. Ira Krebs for plaintiff; William J. Herrick for defendant. Hep-wort- h, Hep-wort- h, City-Pow- MANCA BROS., Proprietors 1--15 |