OCR Text |
Show THE ARGUS 10 LEGAL. Sears Paint A Glass Company vs. Thomas B. al. W. G. Van Horn for plaintiff ; et Margetts Grande has found itself able to con- Sutherland A Murphy for defendants. 0. W. POWERS, tinue its expanding policy, and can Wednesday, April 7th. C. vs. al. Chambers Robert James Nesbitt et construct new lines when other roads Richards A McMillan and Richards A Richards Attorney and Counselor, are financially unable to operate the for plaintiffs; Bennett, llarkness Howat A Eagle Block, corner Second South and West for defendant. Temple Streets, opposite Postoffice Block. lines they have. Aside from the fact Bradley Alfred Green et al. vs. William Atwood II. A. of this company Smith and Frank Pierce for plaintiffs; Richards that the extensions FRANK PIERCE, Richards for defendant. fields for new capital, there is an A W. open D. Barnett vs. Balt Lake City PowerB, E. Attorney, immediate advantage to be obtained Straup A Lippman for plaintiff; William Mc7 McCornick Block. the money that is put in circula- Kay for defendant. tht direction of receivers, the LEGAL. Kio E. B. CRITCHLOW, Attorney, Atlas Block. PROBATE NOTICE. State of Utah, J County of Salt Lake. J DISTRICT COURT, Third Judicial District (Probate Division). In the matter of the estate of James B. Boggs, deceased. Order to show cause why an order or sale of real estate should not be made. S. L. Boggs, one of the heirs at law, and a perC. W. MORSE, son in whose favor a claim against said estate has been duly approved and allowed and who is Attorney at Law, interested in said estate having filed his petition 7 Rooms and 8 Utah Commercial and Savings herein, duly verified, and praying for an order Bank Building, No. 22 E. 1st South St. of sale of a portion or all of the real estate of said decedent for the purposes therein set forth, and it appearing to the Court from such petiN. W. SONNEDECKER,' tion that it is necessary to sell a portion of the Attorney, real estate for the purpose of raising money to 307 McCornick Block. pay the taxes, debts, expenses and charges of administration already accrued and those which will hereafter accrue, and there being no funds in the hands of the administrator, with will annexed, applicable to such purpose, TYPEWRITER osdxxxd that aH persons It is therefore &ofM' estate in interested of said deceased appear the PAPERS, before this Court at the court room in the City CARBONS, County Building, Salt Lake City, Utah, on ITBTI0ET and Wednesday, the 21st day of April, 1897, at 9:30 oclock a. m., to show cause why an order LOW prices. should not be granted to the said executor to MSS. COVERS, sell so much of the real estate of said deceased at public or private sale as shall be necessary, Co. ,pih7r Pembroke Stailoqerg ana that a copy of this order be published at least four successive weeks prior to said date in The Ahous, a newspaper published and printed at Salt Lake City, Utah. FRANK PIERCE, Attorney, Done in open court this 26th day of March, McCornick Building. 1897. OGDEN HILES, Judge. : David C. Dunbar, Clerk. Attest SUMMONS. ska Li. j By George E. Blair, Deputy Clerk. IN THE DISTRICT COURT of the Third E. B. Critchlow, Attorney for Petitioner. mar27-4t-1- 7 Judicial District of the State of Utah, County of Salt Lake. Charles T. Limberg, plaintiff, vs. Kate St. NOTICE OF FORFEITURE. George Perini and Rodney Luxmore St. George, defendants. Summons. The State of Utah sends greeting to Kate To Leo Erdman and James W. Campbell and their heirs and assigns. St. George Perini and Rodney Luxmore St. defendants. George, YOU are notified that I have expended You are hereby required to appear in an ac- the sum of hereby Six Hundred in labor and tion brought against you by the above named improvements upon the Dollars Jossie, Eclipse and Hie Third Mountain Court of the District in Queen Lodes or mining claims situSlaintiff District of the State of Utah, and to Hot ate in Springs Mining District. Salt Lake answer the complaint filed therein within ten County, State of Utah, being the amount redays (exclusive of the day of service), after the quired to hold said lodes for the years 1893 and service on yon of this summons, if served within 1896. And if within ninety after this serthis county ; or, if served out of this county, but vice of publication you fail days nse to conor ref in this district, within twenty days ; otherwise tribute your portion of such expenditure as a within forty days, or judgment by default will in the claims will bebe taken against you, according to the prayer come the your interests the subscriber by virtue of property of said complaint. of the provisions of the statute. The said action is brought to have judgment JOHN P. MEYER. against the defendant, Kate St. George Perini Salt Lake 8 City, Feb. 6th, 1897. for $593.31, with interest thereon from February 10 annum ; of 1897, at the rate 23, per cent, per $100 attorneys fees, and for costa of this suit; S. H. LEWIS, Attorney, alleged to be due on a certain promissory note, 218 S. Main Street. demade, executed and delivered by the said fendant to the plaintiff herein at Salt Lake NOTICE TO CREDITORS. City, June 12, 1893, for the sum of $2000, bearing Estate of Mary White Elvers, Deceased. interest at 10 per cent, per annum, being secured the on even therewith of NOTICE a date is hereby given by the undersigned by mortgage remises hereinafter described, executed by said administrator of the estate of Mary White S efendant Kate St. George Perini to the plaintiff Elvers, deceased, to the creditors of, and all herein; plaintiff being now the owner and persons having claims against the said deceased, holder of said promissory note and mortgage ; to exhibit them with the necessary vouchers that since the execution of said mortgage, plain- within four months after the first publication tiff, at request of defendant, released from said of this notice to the said administrator, at mortgage a certain portion of said property his place of business at 218 South Main hereinafter described ; to have the usual decree Street, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. of this Court for the foreclosure of said mortDated March 1st, 1897. JOHN 8. SCOTT, gage and the sale of said premises, adjudging that the proceeds of said sale be applied in payAdministrator r f the estate of Mary White ment of tne amounts due as above ; that defend- Elvers, decease ants and all persons claiming under them be S. H. Lewis. Attorney for Administrator.'1 marchl3-5t-1- 0 barred and foreclosed of all claim or equity of redemption in said premises j that plaintiff have a deficiency judgment against said defendNOTICE ant, and for other relief; said property being described as follows: All of lots 5, 6, 7, 11 and To the Stockholders of The May Day Mining 12 in Grand View subdivision of Block 114, Plat and Milling Company, a corporation. D, S. L. C. Survey; also lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, YOU are hereby notified that the regular an8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. 14, 15, 167 17. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 in Grand View subdivision of Block 139, nual meeting of the Stockholders of said corpoPlat D," S. L. C. Survey ; also lots 13, 14, 15, 16, ration will be held at the office of the company, 17, 18, 19, 20,21, 22, 23 and 24 in Grand View sub- 23 Central Block, Salt Lake City, Utah, on Fridivision of Block 110, Plat D," S. L. C. Survey, day, the 9th day of April, at the Hour of 3 p. m., all in Salt Lake City and County ; the last des- for the purpose of electing officers for the ensuing year, and for the transaction of such other cribed being property released. And you are hereby notified that if you fail to business as may properly come before the meetF. W. MUHLENBRUCH, Secy. appear and answer the said complaint as above ing. marl3-4t--3 March 6, 1897. Lake Salt City, will the said to the plaintiff apply required, demanded therein. Court for the relief Witness. THE HONORABLE JUDGES W. T. GUNTER, Attorney, and the Seal of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for Progress Building. Seal the State of Utah, this 25th day of PROBATE NOTICE. February, in the year of. our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-seveTHE IN DISTRICT COURT (Probate Divi-sion- ), DAVID C. DUNBAR, Clerk. Third Judicial District,' in and for Salt By Geo. D. Loomis, Deputy Clerk. State of Utah. Lake County, Frank Pierce, Attorney for Plaintiff. In the matter of the estate of Caroline C. Donapl3-5t-- l elson, deceased. Order to show cause why order of sale of real should not be made. estate FRANK D. HuBBS, Attorney, S. Donelson, the administrator of the Joseph Whittingham Block. estate of Caroline C. Donelson, deceased, having filed his petition herein, duly verified, praying No. 3219. of sale of all the real estate of said for an order NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION. decedent, for the purposes therein set forth, it is ordered that all persons interested Land Office at Salt Lake City, Utah, ? in therefore of said deceased, the estate before the 1897. March 11, ) said court on Saturday, the appear 1st day of May, Notice is hereby given that the following-name-d A. D. 1897, at 9:30 oclock a. m., at the court settler has filed notice of his intention to room of said court, at the County Court House, make final proof in support of his claim, and iu the City and County of Salt Lake, Utah, to that said proof will be made before the Register how cause why an order should not be granted and Receiver of United States Land Office at to the said administrator, to sell so much of the Salt Lake City, Utah, on April 24, 1897, viz.: real estate of said deceased at private sale as Thomas Harris on Homestead Entry 9289, for shall be necessary, and that a copy of this order the northwest 54 of Section 21, Township 2, south be published at least four successive weeks in of Range 1 west. The Argus, r newspaper printed and published He names the following witnesses to prove his in said city and county. Witness my hand this 31st day of continuous residence upon and cultivation of said land, viz. : William Smith, John N. Pur-selMarch, A. D. 1897. seal Samuel Bringhurst and Geo. A. Pursell OGDEN HILES, Judge. of Taylorsville, Utah. Attest: David C. Dunbar, Clerk. BYRON GROO, Register. By Geo. E. Blais, Deputy Clerk. W. T, Gunter, Attorney for Administrator. Fbank D. Hobbs, Attorney for Claimant. 306-30- by tion through the medium of labor necessary for the construction. Dur- ing the year 181)6, the company constructed 40 miles of line from its Sevier extension, connecting with the outside world, the gold regions of Marysvale and Gold Mountain which have been retarded in their development from the fact that they were heretofoie remote from railway facilities. In 1892, 48 miles were constructed, giving the matchless Tintic district the blessing of two railroads in place of the former curse of one. Altogether, the mileage of the Rio Grande Western has increased by 20S.3 miles of new' road during the past ten years, aside from numerous spurs, and in the same time it has widened its guage from Grand Junction, Colo, to Ogden, Utah. The physical features of the road are pronounced by competent judges to be superior to those of any western railroad, and in the matter of equipment General Manager Dodge makes the claim that his road is second to none. The claim is frequently made by Colorado people, that the Denver & Rio Grande Railway made Colorado what That its policy of giving it is cheap and rapid transportion to growing communities was the medium that developed the resources of the The Rio Grande Western is State. pursuing the same policy towrard Utah, and wherever it has appeared that a business could be built up by the construction of a few miles of road, the line has been built. The result is that the State is having a network of railroads connecting its growing communities with the outside world ; that the work of development of the natural resources of the State is being greatly aided thereby. The material work of this corporation should appeal to the general public, and the fact should be borne in mind that every dollar that is expended for the operation of the system is expended within the bor ders of Utah, and our money circulation increased by that much, and that whatever it is possible to buy in Utah for the maintenance of the road is purchased here. to-da- y. Xeqal Matters. LAW CASES AT ISSUE. Condition of Judge Cherry's Trlel Calendar for Next Week. EQUITY TRIAL CASES. Judge Hiles Calendar for Trial the Coming Week. The following is a list of the cases set for trial the coming week in Judge Hiles division of the Third District Court: Monday, .psil 5th. I. II. Dewey Furniture Company vs. S. P. Neve et al. R. B. Shepard J. H. Moyle and J. 11. Murphy for plaintiff; Ferguson A Cannon W. Darke for defendants. and S. Eleanor B. Tufts vs. Eldridge Tufts Brown, nenderson A King for plaintiff ; Powers, Straup A Lippman for defendant. Provident Life A Trust Company vs. Orson A. Woolley et al. Bennett, Harkness, Howat A Bradley for defendants. Lydia E. Trumbo vs. George Y. Wallace et al. Sutherland A Murphy for plainiiff; W. C. Hall for defendant. R. K. Shepard vs. George Stanton et aL R. B. Shepard for plaintiff; Powers, Straup A Lippman for defendants. Tuesday, April 6th. B. A. M. Froiseth vs. Ole Peterson S. H. Lewis for plaintiff ; Burgon A Snell and Shepard A Sanford for defendant. Minnie Morley vs. F. D. Clift Powers, Straup A Lippman for plaintiff; J. M. Thomas for defendant. Wednesday, April 7th. P. L. Schmidt pt al. vs. James Thomson et al. Goodwin A Van Pelt and J. J. Rogers for plaintiff; Whittemore A Edwards for defendants. Frank H. Perkins vs. Lottie A. Kelly!'. W. Morse for plaintiff ; H. S. McCallum for defendant. Thursday, April 8th. H. R. Dunniway Lumber Company vs. Ontario Silver Mining Company Loofoourow A Kahn for plaintiff: Bennett, Harkness, Howat A Bradley and S. McDowall for defendant. Frank Thompson, executor, et al. vs. J. G. Jacobs et al. Bennett. Harkness, Howat A Bradley for plaintiffs ; Rawlins A Critchlow for defendants. Salt George Allgood et al. vs. Company Moyle, Zane A Costigan and Fergu-A son. Jackson A Frew for plaintiffs; Richards Richards for defendant. Inter-Mounta- in Encouraged by the success of Sullivan Ingalls, is thinking of becoming a professional special correspondent. ex-Senat- or ex-champi- on 1 66 W. Second North St. ' LOCK BOX 480. FOR THE CURE OF OPIUM up T0M((O HANTS, PRUUKEHHESS aw NEURASTHENIA. THE XXELXY TREATMENT HAS DONE MOBX TO HELP HUMANITY, IN ITS BRIEF TIME, THAN ANY OTHER REFORM MOVEMENT HAS COMPLISHED IN CENTURIES, AC- The following is a list of the civil The Keeley Treatment is adopted by the U. S. Government for use in the National and State the for set trial cases coming Homes for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers and jury Sailors, as also the Regular Army, and the Legof week in Judge Cherry's division islatures of Colorado, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, North Dakota, Oklahoma Territory the Third District Court : and Wisconsin have recegaized it by the enactMonday, April 5th. John II. White ts. William 11. Richards Le Grand Young for plaintiff; Williams, YanCott A Sutherland for defendant. Deseret National llank vs. Burton-GardnCo. Le Grand Young for plaintiff; Marshall & Royle and J. II. Moyle for defendants. James Wrathall vs. B.T. Lloyd et al. James H. Mbyte for plaintiff; . P. Stratton for defendants. er Tuesday, April 6tii. Martin Murray et al. vs. Salt Lake City Railroad Company II. S. McCallum for plaintiff; Rawlins A Critchlow for defendant. Thomas Snowden vs. Pleasant Valley Coal Company John M. Zane for plaintiff; Bennett, Harkness, Howat A Bradley for defendant. William Fowler vs. Pleasant Valley Coal Company Bam attorneys. Grantsville Grocery Company vs. Nat M. Brigham, Marshal 0. W. Morse for plaintiff; Ferguson, Jackson A Frew for defendant. George Mullett A Company vs. T. Burmester et al. Ferguson A Frew for plaintiff; C. W. Morse for defendants. ment of inebriate laws for the sending of worthy indigent patients to Keeley Institutes at publio eXfRESiDENT ANGUS M. CANNON says of the Keeley Treatment: " I thought it impossible for one man to do what Dr. Keeley has done scientifically in counteracting the terrible evils of intemperance. His treatment strengthens men physically, mentally and morally. Under these circumstances they are given another opportunity to become men amongst men. Is there a man who loves his fellow beings that can fail to say : I view Dr. Keeley as engaged in a most commendable work. 1 trust his good work may continuel " INQUIRIES STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. CARDS. l ribbons, ax?,. r, feb6-llt-may- n. l. BASKIN & HOGE, Attorneys at Law 140 S. Main it.. R. N. BASKIN D HOGK over Alffs store. - marl3-6t-1- 7 apl |