Salt Lake Telegram | 1920-10-29 | Page 2 | Women Retain Voting Status after Wedding |

Type	issue
Date	1920-10-29
Paper	Salt Lake Telegram
Language	eng
City	Salt Lake City
County	Salt Lake
Rights	No Copyright - United States (NoC-US)
Publisher	Digitized by J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah
ARK	ark:/87278/s6z90m16
Reference URL	https://newspapers.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6z90m16

Article Title	Women Retain Voting Status after Wedding
Type	wedding
Date	1920-10-29
Paper	Salt Lake Telegram
Language	eng
City	Salt Lake City
County	Salt Lake
Page	2
OCR Text	Show Women Retain Voting Status After Wedding Brides in Utah who have be become become become be- be come so since they registered can vote I just the same as If the marriage marriage marriage mar mar- had hadnot not red Tred it was stated today by James H. H Wolfe assistant state attorney general Many queries have ben received from young oung married women of Utah on this question since the news came from Kansas City that th the registration director there had ruled against the new brides There js ls nothing in the statutes this stat state which would operate against the right of franchise ac accorded accorded accorded ac- ac corded to to women The fact that m marriage has t taken ken place since registration as an unmarried woman does not change her status so far as her hight to vote vole is con con-
Reference URL	https://newspapers.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6z90m16/19726499