Show m 1 Z A n IM imn n z i NOT ego P M j 1 I ir Z R 4 W ime 4 tl u SW z T i 1 4 AJ I 1 1 s T vi 16 2 ait I 1 ai t 1 II ai t 14 sa fe X 21 ac 4 2 i z ar 2 1 T 7 I 1 I 1 M ig tta e w C 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 valc OP OF OUR P RESS OH TO I 1 1 D dab I 1 vy s E imel il r 3 4 Z 3 asi t 7 Z I 1 4 the only amt gincel sanc monroew Mon z ili ja I 1 i I 1 I 1 1 I 1 a 4 f I 1 t I 1 7 vear ye 1 I az ass att 5 77 77 i t fro from chicago leaga chronicle ono one of I 1 c i ih itt in I 1 tho the his not the in inos os t Is ii substantially closed it 1 comprises various subjects venezuelan question the ih e premature p rem adur atur e recognition oi bibian d the case of ex consul wal ler ceic president Clev elands triumph comp I 1 e M foreign enmity la Is defeated ho home me malcott ifsits and conspirators are appease ad dorat or st least they are silenced I 1 e lidl cadiou t of the monroe doe doc 1 Jt elrie I 1 ne 0 as interpreted by cleveland in its itar appl lia U on to arese prese present nt times and circumstances en cum stances tan ces includes every point in dispute 5 bai between tweed the cited states and j gereht britain tite the queens speech by 1 1 proxy pro from the throne conceded in ln general all that the united states had demanded the subsequent I 1 speeches ea of 4 salisbury in the house bouse of lords ind f in the house bouse ot of air on vered iid the entire question particular the simultaneous announcement of office to minister I 1 0 mair a ahat all the english testimony athe of the venezuelan bound iiii surveys and maps wo submitted to the amer ficai commission of which ju stice br ewer is president as a pirt part ony WO before re it Is a conces ton n of of the highest value and of bave iii e importance something amore more was said add salisbury admitted in his awkward tory way that think that the invoking of 1 0 obia doctrine doi trine was controversial I 1 if qua 0 ii unnecessary necessary n for the united stated Sta tei I 1 That ls the united states I 1 were F impelled by a sort of necessity to afi invoke i tuemo the monroe n roe doctrine and it was J evoked 1 ijar aake 4 by pr president es ade n t cleveland in em j letl e language I 1 an guage the premier proceeded sij that interference of the 7 tes in ae the venezuelan controversy i tro wY versy cruy was justified as inter by great gedat britain would be it if ta p powers should attempt 16 tp territorial sovereignty of idl orBel glum r tew months ago salisbury said that 46 does not apply to A d i 1 2 dispute dis P ute he now n ow says tha t avital altal principle of american policy important I 1 in its application ad IV biaas the european policy ta of 4 U dependence for the small er aa I 1 powers I 1 1 mi X declarations were equi equally 1 lly explicit re he said that great would have the slightest intention to violate the substance or the lessenco les e saen sence edof ed of afi the e monroe doctrine nor to p ta the due limit of its colon he added that great britain the monroe doctrine aw with as much affection as animates the united states and claimed credit tor for its british Brit lah origin al this ibis friendly el eloquence 0 ai of and balfour was bic 7 Z a queena address addren lu in which shim settlement controversy I 1 aw Js the abst important t of prest 7 vidia di victories b are of great interest tb e j f ei ex Consul waller is settled be iian the facts in the i I 1 warranted it if the no bad been pending between two diio countries mr waller sad kiil beeh cited consul at tama ta i ja 8 was removed affo and ward procured gin an I 1 1 extensive C I 1 bf lands from the na ria tf uve ve gover i ninino an d lie he remained in ai ft country athe french occupied im i gieir waller wrote r a letter whirl which h hb to the native condition of jaw iz aras the act of a 1 i edw 4 1 t waller the offense and C 0 ay kw of lAmple altot tr instead istead of be kii ear banged agthe the laws of war would old he was sentenced to twenty years 0 imprisonment on represent presen re tad ous anade ade by the united states he 14 was removed t to 0 fran france ce and fel squeak ta J adf 1 he na will a avillia liberty 11 berty but he be wi will 11 have so ab claim th the e U unit i lt 44 attim 6 en froce roce other matter Q of 4 i official 7 ddn dik were ivere f i i ilia this did not iu ah 6 rr ev a n 4 dence with tr i t 77 merely 7 ilia shows the sensa 00 s a L d of 0 the i i res bythe republican wo leiro I 1 lobby syndicate 1 1 I 1 4 il a advises con 7 gre w A sWe df his failure allure to i bai I 1 ts he a I 1 M ir z kl 9 I 1 a barj ta of f lokatz laa ni tatian pm property IW belonging to amer I 1 R A tm 11 s ed e it ifeng an ana a I 1 a I 1 copl Z I 1 r awful I 1 10 lo s abit wem and t le ff g el u 2 Z 6 e T cited I 1 i i Q W war 1 aro taw eai 11 i aln aleste ste I 1 04 bam ci 4 u t top I 1 t 6 b vt 0 ae t we i w aa tt y Q g a 1 0 X 1 tri itt wi ait 1 ar I 1 AMIX aw r heikici 7 I 1 i adin i iii I 1 cok 1 arith 1 tofee thi i Tala ia it elesa 1459 ap pp re 1 isaid I 1 I 1 aua bensa 1 timit it isaik aw diets I 1 laft bew zi tic 16 I 1 Z I 1 barili I 1 A t 1 I 1 1 I mi I 1 97 li ai 1 bytho i A ce L ar e da a bijil SA j W ri jj ana amy wi V A fi w r 4 ain at 4 Z W coq 91 iz t 1 1 t iiii atau I 1 iiii 1 I 1 elieS TS i ae z liv li v NC I 1 1 il ak 71 1 1 I 1 aa A 4 7 W ab aw aa k ic l i N V tsi I 1 I 1 f i I 1 A M 1 7 ra ivi I 1 c i I 1 4 I 1 I 1 P e s s i y ave f 1 Z I 1 Z i g tim j r iiii I 1 i I 1 1 A sk t r important L events in american annalse all with th the il relations PLO iad ot our TOY I 1 to 0 fo bows pows I 1 1 t 4 if I 1 3 S t i 1 i i a tt astl I 1 e s t I 1 A ala 1 eprom id tia C chronicle th the 6 rement has a re foreign mer ce tor or 1895 part porton conour which fills filla we the bre breasts asta of republican ca lamity afla wallers ra with ut di distress strem one of these distressed put partisans isaim telegraphs i ahls paper I 1 fro from M washington g chaj i according to ahls ahia crep report art ti the e d law wh which I 1 ach professed to give 91 ia the ae people lutife of th e cOli country their aix goods 16 f free r liolia tariff exactions ritually actually collect collected duty per cent of the 9 goods 0 ds wai f ca we re brought into the con country 2 h try 11 while the mckinley irwin I 1 its ts Is last at fiscal year collected duty only on al 41 per der cent of the goods brought iu in P this im implies plies that the new law la 13 IL ft i diabolical contrivance which while see seeming ming to reduce the taxes in fact increases them that tha t Is the burden of the lamentation if it ishoi Is not altogether senseless eab and I 1 the ahe implication Is strengthened when the mourner changes his form of words and says that under the mckinley law the people got practically two thirds of their Ini imported ported goods free of of duty while under the wilson law they are getting less than halt half free of duty it if one could Ov overcome Arcome the arithmetical di difficulty in the conceiving of 52 per cent as equivalent aut to two thirds he be would woul dInter infer that the democrats had bad been wickedly and maliciously heaping taxes on imports while pretending to take false off MY the taxes but what have we here one jeremiah proceeds to say the me increase In creaso of 0 f importation of dutiable goods is something enormous w while h I 1 I 1 e the f free re 0 importations have not increased the total importation of dutiable goods during 1895 was while the total importation of goods paying duty la in the last fiscal year of d the I 1 e M mckinley law amoun a tad to only thus the now new law Is nearly doubling the amount of dutiable goods brought into the country but giving the people no more free importations than did the mckinley lawso it appears when we come down to figures that the difference in the proportion of dutiable to free goods is due not to transferring goods from the latter category to the former but to an increase in the importation of dutiable goods why the increase plainly because ea use the dutiable goods are not taxed so outrageously as they were under the mckinley law with the burden of taxation lifted the people can buy more and enjoy more and this remark applies no more to imported goods than to like goods of domestic production the same cause which has reduced the pric prices es of the former has equally reduced the prices of the latter the people are able to consume and enjoy in more ore of both foreign and domestic goods and the relief from burd burden en on domestic goods Is fully three times as great as the relief frd from m burden on foreign goods good a because the people consume colsum e fully three times the qu quantity antiey of domestic goods as they do 0 of f co competing mp 0 ti n 9 foreign goods but let u us 6 not claim too much for the n new ew law b because eca use the washington jeremiah invites us ug to do so with his misleading figures he compares the du liable imports in 1835 1895 I 1 with the dutiable imports during the last fase fiscal al year of the mckinley lawt law 1894 but he be omits to state that the dutiable imports in 1894 were exceptionally low lower in fact fecter than they had been for more than a qu i ar arter ter of a century the following statement of the value of dutiable imports each year begian beginning I 1 ng w with I 1 t h th the e fiscal year 1886 and ending with the calendar year 1895 will show how bow misleading the comp comparison arlson is dutiable I 1 I 1 41 i 4 year 4 f rr 1 Im imports portaL 1886 1887 1987 IM 1888 1889 4 1890 1891 1892 1893 I 1 1894 14 1895 9 1 this table shows that the dutiable imports list last year were much less th than in any one of I 1 five oi of the last ten ien years an and d less thin than they were in 1890 under a good stiff republican I 1 tariff tar iff the washington calamity UM man makes make d further comparisons butas but as they in are of same misleading abing ading character because they ara all mado do with the very ex exceptional year 1894 etli it unnecessary is untie cessare to analyze them it will suffice to xay ay thai when it comes to compain comparing ing ati ue dis received fido fie emits wi that exceptional year for an 0 obvious b 6 us jr easan he says that the collections of customs s under the ne newlan gaii amount coonly to MOM ahil thos e gf the mckan le illah amounted I 1 to li in in its it yea year r cinc and 73 ia aa its a if he had addid added the fact thai aoi iiii the third ichi year of the th e kekin kj tariff I 1 amounted 4 1 92 d ali he would s its ve spoiled hla his L z c 1 II 11 11 ld la me biado I 1 L 1 yx r t A r 1 k 1 5 i v I 1 1 1 I i ra i r 5 I 1 1 brak z ta in theSa iii tC ak se I 1 r IQ coubler I 1 jau n RV jf if t I 1 16 ti rne ui thai InY of I 1 1 Y 1 i 0 ft i di result jf oft I 1 t l w A ta this mi b viria kive hate I 1 bie batot jt Is 11 7 it tat PIA sia ak ii 1 ilme p eal put v an I 1 AC I 1 i hiis W Si is 1 1 X 1 ow 4 I 1 I 1 vv V v f Q a n lz L W j I 1 rt r T 11 r ar ia 1 V es da W ak r I 1 m I 1 air 1 I f ra ta se un g it 11 zt 11 az 1 I 1 I r at 4 il i j aa ft I 1 I 1 I 1 az I 1 M w 1 e n 1 i I 1 W A I 1 jy 1 JI pow 01 ol nId f A ke I 1 i AA il ta a vow avow irv p arl 1 I 1 t t 01 I 1 izz I 1 |