Show EDMUNDS EFFORTS Prope prospects of the polygamy bill in in the house by W U to the tho I herald lerald 11 N NEW r YOKE march abe posts washington special says the polygamy bill may not como come up till tho tile house goe goes to the speakers table and a motion to do that cant bo be mado made until the expiration expiration of another morning hour it is not ertain certain therefore that the subject will be brought day lay laybhen when the speakers table is again B z ached burrows Il of michigan sol suggests ests a pint p ant which may relieve speaker er ke keiler I of his difficulty and enable hini to rule merely with the law lav of parliamentary procedure that the bill is is nat not sub subject atto to the point of order thatis that it macs makes an appropriation burrows on examining the local statutes atutes st of utah to w which lie has been giving much attention in connection with iho tile prospective debate on polygamy discovered that they require the territory to make appropriation fur the expenses cfall of all election officers the tile judges i whose ollices it is proposed to ere create ite by the bill are election officers era and the query naturally arises whether under tho territorial law the territory w will ill not bo be required to ta kiy pe their salaries congress by virtue vi r auty of its controlling control ii ng pow power er simply si inserts these election elet tion huners in the legal machinery odthe territory and their expenses may very properio prop eriv bo be paid under the tile territorial law I if ralis this point t can a n be sustained and it is is the ees best t on one e yet suggested to take the bill out ot of the tile rution of the ulc ule the tile poly polygamy gainy og abate may proceed when next the speakers table is is if I lion lo 10 wever cv er the speaker does not rule in in that it will vv ill bo be possible for republicans still to reach the tile bi bill I I in a different way ft ay much interest is manifested tok tornow now how flow the democrats ats will voto vote on this question stion there is an impre selon duct t that athey they have changed their views anil anti were about determining to vote forthe for the bill this at least is is the impression of some of tile laicans icons who aro are managing matters but the impression is certainly not founded on anything an tiling the democrats to this time have bave donbor done or indicated if the polygamy bill passes it may of itself settle t tho io case of cannon with the edmunds bill is law cannon an could not liopo hope to keep his seat teat even if iulio lie hopes to bo be admitted |