Show MAN WORE LING LINGERIE for economys sake penurious achl cagaoan donned spouses underwear stingiest stringiest Stin giest man Ch chicago leago oue one of the most remark oble instances of penuriousness recorded in a court document came to light the other day when a deputy clerk of the abo superior for court engaged in filing papers in a divorce suit came across the case of mrs carrie ellea eliza both forman ferman against christian P for fer man here alere Is a sentence from the bill which only explains the case in part tho the defendant was of such on en economical turn of mind that he a times insisted on wearing the under wear ivear of your judge dupuy heard the sult rind and in questioning airs ferdan he said bald that her ber husband was so ao stingy that he be deprive I 1 her and tier her young daugh ter At ertle or of sufficient lood and clothing the parties to the cult ere are well known in n certain south side elde circles since the wife her decree divorce she has ban married otio one of tux itie department managers in a large stock yarda concerti concern while thi the defendant ex husband has betoken betaken him self seir to california one of the lonians womans won ians chief llona lions la Is her ber beauty and it Is that her husband jealous of ti tier her c harms concluded that the safea plan to prevent he her displaying them theia was waa to deprive her of attractive cloth ing and to subject her to mental menial ot ru eu potion in their dome borne when writ airs perman ferman rel related ted cpr tory story in court sho cald that her huband pinched her ber leaving her firms black and blue for days at a time on some borne mccask Jina ps ho he was so BO stingy tuat he be apprel probated approbated ap her line 1 I p v fijn underwear to va cave V e himself the expense 0 buying garments garn senta for ble bla own use se too hat she ehe was to procure lothing only after she two of the rooms in their bome to outsiders |